Search for: "John Doe C"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 5,538
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2012, 10:42 am
Focusing on originality, quality over quantity, and publishing less while spending more time on writing — does work. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 11:10 am
CiteID=465081Appeal from the District Court of Sheridan County, the Honorable John G. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
Usually, when it comes down to defending claims in federal rather than state court, we’ll choose federal court.So what does Article III standing have to do with that? [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:46 am
It’s a matter of common sense and fairness.If hearsay weren’t excluded, John Doe could take the stand and say Jane Doe told him the defendant – Richard Roe – who’s on trial for murder confessed to the whole thing. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:45 am
Petitioner raised five grounds for cancellation: that Respondent permits its marks to be used for purposes other than certification (Section 14(5)(C) of the Lanham Act); that respondent does not control use of its marks (Section 14(5)(A)); that respondent discriminates in refusing to certify (Section 14(5)(D)); that the marks are generic for the goods; and that respondent committed fraud on the USPTO in securing the registrations. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
Professor C. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 11:55 am
Paul Stephan, the John C. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 2:46 pm
What does it mean to CONTEST a will or trust then? [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:53 pm
But the equivalent state law, Chapter 151B, does not. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 2:10 am
"The Board agreed with Examining Attorney Jeffrey C. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
., Civil Action No. 00-C-1180H, Amended Order Denying Class Certification (Dec. 12, 2001) (Hutchison, J.), 2001 WL 1818442 (Dec 13, 2001). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:02 am
Fernandez, K., Levinson, C., & Rodebaugh, T. (2012). [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:45 am
The second man was caught peeing near Merrimack and John Streets. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:31 am
C. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 10:32 am
It also does not show that Mr. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:02 am
The Board observed that Section 2(c) and 2(d) contain express exceptions like that which Applicant proposes. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 6:30 am
My apologies to Jim and John for that mistake.) [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:32 am
It also does not show that Mr. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:12 am
The section 104(a)(2) exclusion may apply to damages recovered for a personal physical injury or physical sickness under a statute, even if that statute does not provide for a broad range of remedies. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:12 am
The new regulation, cited as 26 CFR 1.104-1(c), makes two substantive changes. [read post]
