Search for: "Kennedy Thomas"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 4,886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
The fact that Judge Garland is not only extremely intelligent and respectful but exceptionally careful and quite centrist would mean that his views would have particular salience with, among others, Justices Kennedy and Alito. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:03 pm
Justices Kennedy and Alito dissented. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 8:42 am
Now consider these picks for the Republicans -- Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, Alito. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 11:56 am
Kennedy, J., and Thomas, J., filed concurring opinions. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 11:40 am
Kennedy and Steinbeck. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:07 am
[New York Times] * New addition to the Third Circuit: Judge Thomas Vanaskie. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:41 pm
Justice Scalia wrote an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, and Justice Kennedy dissented, with Justice Alito joining in his opinion. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:18 pm
Nixon appointed 4 Justices (Burger, Powell, Blackmun, Rehnquist), Ford 1 (Stevens), Carter 0, Reagan 3 (O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy), Bush I 2 (Souter, Thomas), Clinton 2 (Ginsburg, Breyer), Bush II 2 (Roberts, Alito), and Obama so far 2 (Sotomayor, Yournamehere). [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:10 pm
Justice Alito delivered the majority opinion (not surprising, given his comments at oral argument), and he was joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas (Kennedy and Thomas filed concurring opinions as well). [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:59 am
Roberts, Jr., Justices Kennedy, Thomas, and Antonin Scalia. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 1:35 pm
Kennedy 1. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:51 pm
., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which STEVENS, SCALIA, KENNEDY, THOMAS, GINSBURG, BREYER, and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 8:16 am
’” Kennedy asked. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
Justice Stevens is often, but certainly not always, one of the more reliable justices for giving some real offset to at least five of the justices who are more dangerous to civil liberties, those five being Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Kennedy. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:10 pm
Justice Stevens joined Justice Kennedy’s opinion and did not write separately. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 2:05 pm
As usual, Justice Thomas did not speak. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 10:18 am
Assuming that Stevens and Thomas might take opposite sides, it appeared that either Kennedy or Breyer, or perhaps both, would hold the balance. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
The next body of cases involves less traditional alignments among the Justices – generally, the Court’s left (Stevens, Ginsburg, and Souter) and right (Scalia and Thomas) wings joining together to form a five-Justice majority. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:09 am
I'll grant that Stevens First Amendment views seem to have become more liberal, but on the issue of reproductive rights, which is where Taylor seems to hang his hat, it seems to me that Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy and Souter were actually acting as one would expect a conservative jurist to act, by respecting stare decisis. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 5:13 pm
While Justice Kennedy takes a broader view of the Establishment Clause than do Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas (and, probably, Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito), he is on the record — in his County of Allegheny dissent (1989) — as opposing the no-endorsement interpretation of the Establishment Clause. [read post]
