Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 6,179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2013, 1:02 am
As the chief attorney for the National Association of Colored People (NAACP), he played a role in many civil rights cases, and was primarily responsible for developing the legal strategy that led to the Brown v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 2:01 pm
See Judge Elsa Alcala's opinion (pdf) on behalf of the majority, a concurrence (pdf) from Judge Tom Price, and a dissent (pdf) from Judge Lawrence Meyers.The case - Wehrenberg v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 1:35 am
” Reynolds v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 4:00 pm
In Angelica Textile Services, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Here, the word Clubcard was not deemed to be distinctive enough as to refer solely to Tesco. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm
Oyama v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:03 pm
Avoiding takedowns based solely on keywords, as happened to Cory Doctorow’s book Homeland which was targeted for mass takedowns based on ownership of the TV show. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 11:43 am
In Brucia v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 9:15 am
We aren’t out to sue people. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:26 am
Actual Duties Must Be Considered In a recent decision in Richard Sewell v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:26 am
A recent court decision may give this argument more strength.Actual Duties Must Be Considered In a recent decision in Richard Sewell v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:07 am
In one recent Virginia case, Hall v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 10:49 am
Jones v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
Cooper, in his November 29, 2013 opinion in Travis v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:27 am
Case T‑394/10, Elena Grebenshikova v OHIM, Volvo Trademark Holding AB intervening, is a fascinating decision of the General Court of the European Union (Third Chamber) on 5 December. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 4:34 pm
See Corporation of Presiding Bishop v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:10 am
Corp. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:07 am
Beyond the accredited investor verification requirements noted above, the SEC has proposed several additional new rules in connection with Rule 506(c) offerings, including (i) requiring an “advance” Form D filing at least 15 days before generally soliciting; (ii) requiring a “closing amendment” to Form D at the conclusion of the offering; (iii) temporarily requiring funds to submit all general solicitation materials to the SEC in advance of their use; (iv) mandating that… [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:46 am
Thomas v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:27 am
In Millard v Miller, No. 05-C-103-S, 2005 U.S. [read post]
