Search for: "Richards v. United States" Results 3801 - 3820 of 4,434
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm by Andrew Koppelman
" Three Vice Presidents of the United States presiding over the Senate, Richard Nixon, Hubert Humphrey, and Nelson Rockefeller, have all ruled that the Senate rules can be changed by a simple majority of the Senate. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:56 pm by carie
Case 2:04-cv-01156- GLF-MRA Document 594 Filed 10/23/09 Page 1 of 4UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION RICHARD COOEY, et al., Plaintiffs Case No. 2:04-cv-1156 JUDGE GREGORY FROST v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 8:43 am by Martin George
Buxbaum, Public law, Ordre public and arbitration: a procedural scenario and a suggestion Richard D. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm by Tom Goldstein
Abbott Docket: 08-645 Argument date: January 12, 2010 Question presented: Under a treaty signed by the United States, a child taken from his home country in violation of a "right of custody" generally must be returned to that country. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Charles Dickens did this, but his heavy schedule of public performances in the United States, where his works were not protected by copyright, arguably contributed to his untimely death.Dickens visited the United States twice. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am by Ray Mullman
  That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Speakers: Dana Berliner (Institute for Justice, Virginia), Richard A. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 11:03 am by Michael Fox
While I haven't read the whole article, I was struck by one of his introductory comments: In many ways, United States labor and employment law sleepwalked into cyberspace. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
In the Chrysler bankruptcy case (Indiana State Police Pension Trust, et al., v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm by Sheppard Mullin
In September 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed that holding in Jones v. [read post]