Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 7,506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2014, 6:44 pm
I am surprised to learn that I did not cover the Court of International Trade's classification decision in Alcan Food Packaging v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:51 pm
Lennox Lewis v Don King, [2004] EWCA Civ1329 (House of Lords, Supreme Court of Judicature). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:21 pm
Comments In the Grand Chamber judgment in Guja v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:10 pm
As artfully stated in the recent decision of Reid v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 11:36 am
As Justice Kennedy put it in Arizona v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 7:28 am
Thus, in story, the character's interaction with the external world reveals the internal state of mind. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:37 am
Bancorp v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
Zacchini v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:01 pm
Telchadder v Wickland Holdings Ltd [2014] UKSC 57 I will admit to being a bit cool on static caravan parks. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Chapter Readings· Marbury v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:45 pm
Autopsy – An examination of a body after death to determine the cause of death or the character and extent of changes produced by disease. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:24 am
Dunson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 3:17 pm
See Williams v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:00 am
In such cases the court is not discussing the truth or reasonableness of any of the doctrines of the religious association, but as stated by Lord Davey in General Assembly of the Free Church of Scotland v Overtoun [1904] AC 515 (1904 7 F (HL) 1): “The more humble, but not useless, function of the civil Court is to determine whether the trusts imposed upon property by the founders of the trust are being duly observed. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 11:38 am
Its subject matter is the protracted civil litigation that extended from a brief County Court hearing in 2007 to the Supreme Court judgment of Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 10:41 am
Case citation: Perkins v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
In response, Specsavers relied not on the use of the wordless mark itself, but on the use of the following logo (which became known as the ‘shaded logo’): Article 15 of the CTM Regulation states that the use of a registered trade mark may be made “in a form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark in the form in which it was registered”. [read post]
