Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 19,217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2008, 8:20 pm
United States, 523 U.S. 296, 300 (1998) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 10:00 am
” Wreal, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:18 am
Secondly, the GC had erred in law by stating that the Board of Appeal should have explained the reason why it had not taken into account the EUIPO’s findings in the three previous decisions with regard to the reputation of the earlier marks. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 9:55 pm
It ruled that Applicant Frisch's Restaurants is entitled to registration of the mark BIG BOY for "tartar sauce and pies" and for "restaurant, drive through and carryout services" for the states of Indiana and Kentucky, and for certain counties in Tennessee and Ohio. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 3:32 am
While he knows the case was watched closely by other attorneys, he believes the court's decision in Santos v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 6:43 am
Persis International, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:36 am
” Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 7:27 am
Structures, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
A cross by the side of a public highway marking, for instance, the place where a state trooper perished need not be taken as a statement of governmental support for sectarian beliefs. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:33 pm
(internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:35 pm
This afternoon the Court granted review in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:16 pm
New York marks the fifth state in a row in which marriage equality has been achieved legislatively rather than through state court intervention: soon after Varnum v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:32 am
Romeril v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:32 am
Romeril v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:03 pm
Crews v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:00 am
In Hobbie v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:29 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm
In 2017, in Matal v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
Business marked up the base rates charged by the third-party providers in return for the service it provided. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]