Search for: "State v. Means" Results 3801 - 3820 of 61,269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” That means any consumer who wants to sue Amazon must do so under the laws of Washington State, and more importantly in this case, the WCPA. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 5:04 am by INFORRM
In the case of Green v Pierce Countery, 98768-8, the Supreme Court of the State of Washington held  a man with a YouTube channel does not qualify as a member of the media under the state’s public records law, meaning he is not entitled to certain records that are available to news organizations but otherwise exempt from release to the general public. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 11:55 am by Mike Underwood
By Mike Underwood The United States Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 5:05 pm by Randazza
That means there is a strong argument for Texas law to be applied. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:36 am
More detailed consideration may follow in due course.IPKat readers who have followed this saga will know that earlier this year Mr Justice Arnold gave the first detailed consideration of what a Swiss-form claim means, see blog post here and here. [read post]