Search for: "United States v. May" Results 3801 - 3820 of 47,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2012, 7:57 am by Peter Vickery
Opponents of untrammeled corporate campaign spending may have cause for optimism if a conservative organization “dedicated to fighting environmental extremism” persuades the Supreme Court of the United States to hear its case.American Tradition Partnership, Inc., (ATP) is challenging Montana’s campaign contributions law, the Corrupt Practices Act of 1912. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:25 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Last week, we filed on behalf of the Legion of Valor of the United States and the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation an amicus brief in the Stolen Valor Act case before the Supreme Court, United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:50 am by Michael O'Hear
United States (No. 09-1227), the Court ruled that a defendant may raise a Tenth-Amendment challenge to the statute under which she was convicted. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See, for example, Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v United States, 491 U.S. 617, 623 n. 3, 109 S Ct 2646, 105 L. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
  The United States District Court for the District of Arizona granted CCRRG’s motion to compel arbitration and dismissed the action. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 6:36 pm
According to an article today in the Abu Dhabi daily The National, more than 20 states in the United States have passed laws, or have legislation pending, to require state pension funds to divest stocks of companies doing business in Iran. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:22 pm by Bill Amadeo
In a decision that has shocked many in the legal community across the country, The United States Supreme Court made a controversial ruling on June 26th stating that evidence found by police officers after illegal stops may be used in court if the officers conducted their searches after learning that the defendants had outstanding arrest warrants. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 8:22 pm by Florian Mueller
Gilstrap--whose more formal title is Chief United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas--handed down a scheduling order in the Ericsson v. [read post]