Search for: "50 Doe Defendants"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 7,348
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2015, 3:48 pm
(Defendant's Tr. 2/14/11 p. 83). [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 6:45 am
The Court of Appeals ruling does not tell us what happened in this case, but this comes from the district's post-trial ruling:On September 26, 2009, Rogich, a member of the Bureau of Special Operations (BSO), participated in the arrest of the defendant. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
49 50 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 51 52 Section 1. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
49 50 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 51 52 Section 1. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:11 am
New York’s Statutory Right to PrivacyNew York State does not does not recognize a common-law right of privacy, and its only privacy statute, New York Civil Rights Law §§ 50 and 51, is a right of publicity statute. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
This list can be expanded for as long as it takes to recount nearly 50 years of doctrine. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:47 am
Specifically, children under age 12 represent 50% of the dog bite and dog attack victims. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Other defendants include the Secretary of the Treasury, the IRS, and a host of other government officials. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 6:17 pm
Depending on the risk group, rates of death from listeriosis range from 10% to 50%, with the highest rate among newborns in the first week of life. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm
Berkowitz, 50 NY2d 333, 349 [Ct. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 10:36 am
When multiple cases are filed in different places, the defendant has to fight the same battle numerous times. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 11:21 am
” Further, the depiction of children, by itself, does not create special circumstances which should make a privacy claim more readily available.We note that defendant’s conduct here, while clearly invasive, does not implicate the type of criminal conduct covered by Penal Law § 250.40 et seq., prohibiting unlawful surveillance. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 11:16 am
It was just the second such call in 50 years. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
As we pointed out in our prior 50-state survey post on this subj [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:23 am
Frankly, a forum selection provision does not impair any shareholder’s right to hold his or her agents on the board accountable. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 11:49 am
The Court’s analysis in Brulotte, however,does not apply to a situation such as this one, in whichCongress, by creating the pediatric exclusivity period,explicitly authorized additional market exclusivity to begranted to the patent owner beyond the life of the patent.In Brulotte, anyone was free to use the patented technologyafter the patent expired. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 11:01 am
As a result, the Court is left to parse a lengthy laundry list of FDCA provisions and FDA regulations.Id. at *50. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 8:16 pm
-EV] … Even when the statement made does not purport to include all of the small group or class but only some of them, as in the case of “Some of A’s children are thieves,” it is still possible for each member of the group to be defamed by the suspicion attached to him by the accusation. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 11:36 am
I work for defendants. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
In any event, this case underscores how the curse of multi-jurisdiction litigation potentially can be a problem for everyone, not just the defendants – although, to be sure, in this case, Wal-Mart probably at this point does not have a problem with the way things turned out, at least so far. [read post]
