Search for: "A B C Insurance" Results 3821 - 3840 of 5,818
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2012, 3:08 am by Lawrence Cunningham
Interpretation and Effect: Kevin Costner’s Bison      An Aborted Vineyard Sale, A Crop Insurance Caper B. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 4:00 pm by University of Illinois Law Review
  (PDF) Fairness Versus Welfare in Health Insurance Content Regulation – Amy B. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by J. Yackley
After your consultation, the QRC will determine if you are a “qualified employee,” which means"anemployee who, because of the effects of a work-related injury or disease, whether or not combined with the effects of a prior injury or disability: A. is permanently precluded or is likely to be permanently precluded from engaging in the employee's usual and customary occupation or from engaging in the job the employee held at the time of injury; B. cannot reasonably be… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm by Antoinette Konski
            (c)        What effects, if any, do patents and exclusive licenses on genetic diagnostic tests have upon the interpretation of testing results? [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:51 pm
One could say that this would depend on different circumstances including but not limited to a) the amount of force the body was subjected to b) the size of the surface area that produces the force or energy and c) the characteristics of the target area (i.e.- the amount of nerves, muscles, or skin that the affected area is made up of.) [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 12:48 pm by Ken
In other words, the safe harbor provision of the DMCA does not provide a defense that "we did not infringe because we took steps a, b, and c"; it provides a defense "we are not civilly liable for infringement because we took steps a, b, and c. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:34 am by admin
We set out below some of the key principles that emerge from the cases discussed below: (a)     co-operating with competition authorities for a speedy resolution may help reduce penalties (see EU: European Commission (‘Commission’) Fines Producers Of CRT Glass €128 Million In Cartel Settlement); (b)     a competition authority may recommend shareholders to replace their directors or officers if they do not fully cooperate with… [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
P. 45(b)(2)(C), or service on a national or resident of the United States abroad under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:56 pm by Benjamin Wittes
By Benjamin Wittes & Ritika Singh The military commission for Abd al-Rahim Hussein Muhammed Abdu Al-Nashiri convenes again tomorrow for a motions hearing at Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:34 pm by Alexander J. Davie
The legal portion of due diligence involves ensuring (a) that the company has been validly formed and exists, (b) that the buyer has an accurate understanding of the company’s ownership and the rights of the different owners and the company’s management, (c) the buyer understands what litigation is pending or could arise in the future, (d) that the current insurance is adequate, (e) that the company is in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am by Law Lady
Supreme Court.Attorney's fees -- Prevailing party -- Injunction -- Trial court erred in awarding prevailing party attorney's fees to homeowners association in action seeking injunction to require that homeowner obtain insurance on home in accordance with subdivision declaration where association had adequate remedy at law by obtaining insurance coverage on home and assessing the cost against the homeowner -- Because association had adequate remedy at law, trial court… [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:53 am by emagraken
  ICBC argued that UMP coverage was forfeited because the Claimant was a passenger in a vehicle that he “knew or ought to have known was being operated without the consent of the owner” contrary to section 148.1(3)(b) of the Insurance (Vehicle) Regulation. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:08 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers
BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Edwards, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Akzo Nobel UK Ltd and Excess… [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 6:35 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The jury found: (1) the defendants had engaged in unfair or deceptive acts and that such conduct was a producing cause of damages to Beaston; and (2) defendants did not: (a) engage in any false, misleading or deceptive act or practice; (b) engage in any unconscionable action or course of action; (c) commit negligence; or (d) commit gross negligence. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:55 am by David Cosgrove
The information provided warned the potential investor that the investment was high-risk, was dependent on fluctuations in the lending and housing market, and was not insured. [read post]