Search for: "Cash v. Cash"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 8,558
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2014, 3:48 pm
LLC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:00 pm
They've got an app for that.The settlement at issue in this case gives former franchisees $475 in cash and adds some ancillary relief. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:43 am
The answer can be found in the case of Branch v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 5:09 pm
Welsh, Montclair, pro se and for respondent, Elmira V. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:57 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 3:21 pm
Free food regular rate miscalculation cases have actually been around in California since the Seventies (e.g., Marshall v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Pearson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Pearson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:00 pm
Maurer v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 12:53 pm
According to the employee, his supervisor told him to “pad” his expense reports to get cash to pay for the strip club outings. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 8:09 am
The style of the case is, Avila v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:33 am
Facts In Eastenders, customs officers entered Eastenders’ premises and detained alcoholic goods so that further enquiries could be made, after employees were unable to provide evidence that duty had been paid on them. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 4:35 pm
Slade v. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 6:52 am
In Saucier v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:46 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:46 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:17 pm
Braese, Jr. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:47 pm
October 2012 (MC)), investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, sued for defamation (For example, see Applause Store Productions Ltd v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781; Cairns v Modi [2012] EWHC 756 (QB); [2012] EWCA Civ 1382; Tilbrook v Parr [2012] EWHC 1946 (QB). [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
” Similarly, they could choose to accept cash from a customer as payment for private dances, but if the customer offered special “dance dollars,” (of which the club took a cut) instead of cash (which the club did not touch), the dancer was not allowed to refuse. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 6:54 am
Further, the parties offered no justification for apportioning only $10,000 toward PAGA penalties (Ceja-Corona v CVS Pharmacy, Inc, October 30, 2014, Boone, S). [read post]
