Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 3821 - 3840 of 40,567
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2022, 11:16 am by Jonathan Bailey
Alexander had sought $2 for every copy of WWE 2K sold, an amount that would have equaled roughly $20 million. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 7:37 am by Erik W. Weibust
” Express One asserts claims for breach of contract, fraudulent inducement, and trade secret misappropriation under the Defend Trade Secrets Act and the Utah Uniform Trade Secrets Act, among other things. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:25 am by Peter J. Sluka
Notably, it does not require that the defendant act in bad faith to personally profit from usurping the opportunity—one of the elements that Justice Schecter found lacking in Shatz. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 3:28 am by Jan Jacobi
Secondly, the court holds that the Land Rover Defender must be considered a work of applied art, to which article 2(7) BC applies. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm willing to accept these costs in the rare situation where I have a motion pending on the subject; but I think it would be bad to incur the costs in writing about Doe and those like her more generally. [2.] [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:58 pm by John Jascob
The court, which granted a prior motion to dismiss because the 1934 Act does not apply extraterritorially, concluded that plaintiffs alleged sufficiently that certain stock purchases and the purchase of a debenture from the defendant were domestic under U.S. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
App. 1931), the defendants made a motion picture of the early life of the plaintiff, who had been acquitted in a notorious murder case. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
The fourth count, a restraint of trade claim, does not specify the relief sought. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:08 pm by Howard Bashman
” Yesterday, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania upheld the defendant’s conviction by a vote of 5-to-2. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 11:29 am by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2022) In a 2-1 decision, the Federal Circuit has denied Monolithic’s petition for writ of mandamus seeking to escape from Judge Albright W.D. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court to Hear 2 Cases with Major Implications for 2024 MSN – Zach Montellaro (Politico) | Published: 9/29/2022 The U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
We can't just assume Putin was bluffing, but neither should we attribute to him an extortionate threat that doesn't include an off-ramp by which the West can capitulate (not that I'm arguing for capitulation).That leaves us with two main possibilities:(1) Putin does not intend to use nukes to defend territory in the illegally annexed regions; he only would resort to nuclear warfare if Ukraine with Western backing attacks territory that is universally acknowledged to… [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 3:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
" The court allowed the plaintiffs to go ahead with their intentional interference with prospective business relationship claim, which has as its elements, "(1) a business relationship between the plaintiff and another party; (2) the defendant's intentiona [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 3:04 pm by Benjamin Wittes
In no way does the Acting Secretary condone this practice and he has immediately ordered an inquiry into the matter. [read post]
There are four types of restrictive covenants: 1) non-competition; 2) non-solicitation of customers; 3) non-solicitation of employees; and 4) non-disclosure. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 9:48 am by Ross Roubion and Taylor Ashworth
“Unreasonably Dangerous” Conditions If a risk of harm is open and obvious to all who may encounter it, the likelihood that it will cause harm is decreased, and it will not be considered unreasonably dangerous under Louisiana law.[2] This is critical because a defendant does not generally have a duty to protect against an open and obvious hazard.[3] If a plaintiff cannot prove that the defendant owed a duty to protect against the risk of harm, the… [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 6:31 pm by Dennis Crouch
  Meredith Martin Addy (AddyHart) argued for the patentee; Michael Dowler (Park Vaughan) for the defendant-appellee. [read post]