Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 6,532
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2013, 9:22 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 7:57 am
United States). [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:19 pm
An NSA official said that the agency’s collection methods are “tuned to be looking outside the United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 11:19 am
The Fourth Circuit, in a surprisingly strong opinion by Judge Wilkinson in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:34 am
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:35 am
Debord v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
”And finally, did:the combined effect of [R (Limbuela) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396 (HL(E)) ] and Clue establish that there is a free standing duty to accommodate and provide cash to a person like the Claimant who is within the boundaries of a local authority and whose Convention rights are threatened? [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
”And finally, did:the combined effect of [R (Limbuela) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396 (HL(E)) ] and Clue establish that there is a free standing duty to accommodate and provide cash to a person like the Claimant who is within the boundaries of a local authority and whose Convention rights are threatened? [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:45 pm
The Federal Trademark Dilution Act, as amended by the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006, states the following (as cited by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (the "Second Circuit") in its Opinion): In determining whether a mark or trade name is likely to cause dilution by blurring, the court may consider all relevant factors, including the following:(i) The degree of similarity between the mark or trade name and the famous… [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:13 am
That competition concern harkens all the way back to United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:59 am
The case, TARPEH v. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 3:08 pm
Rev. 693 (1976) --Poe v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
Nevertheless, the United States Tax Court disallowed the deductions, ruled for the Commissioner, and Vetrick appealed. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm
The United States Supreme Court has unequivocally established that in civil commitment hearings, the standard of proof can be no lower than “clear and convincing evidence” to satisfy procedural due process under the United States Constitution. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:48 am
State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm
The case went up to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which issued what is still the best opinion in favor of these constitutional arguments, Glik v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 2:04 am
People v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:29 am
No trade dress this time.This first Apple v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
City of Cincinnati, 622 F.3d 524, 538 (6th Cir. 2010) (holding, in reviewing a preliminary injunction, that plaintiff had shown a likelihood of success on his claim that a restriction on speech in a nonpublic forum was unconstitutionally vague); United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. [read post]
