Search for: "Does 1 - 33"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 6,151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
Northwest Environmental Defense Center (Granted )Docket: 11-338Issue(s): (1) Whether a citizen may bypass judicial review of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting rule under 33 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 3:45 pm
Just because one method of hydraulic fracturing worked in one part of the Eagle Ford does not mean it will work a few miles away. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:23 am
Why does the divorce lawyer care? [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:52 am
Slip op. at 33-35. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:45 pm
There are no restrictions on the advocate’s right to cross-examine another lawyer, however, and the lawyer who does appear as a witness should not expect to receive special treatment because of professional status. [20] In addition, among the commentaries to Rule 5.1-1 is the following: [5] A lawyer should refrain from expressing the lawyer’s personal opinions on the merits of a client’s case to a court or tribunal. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:35 pm
” Id., p. 33, 37 [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
Dressen’s three applications to SIHS for staff privileges dated Dec. 1, 2011 (47 pages), Feb. 19, 2009 (37 pages) and Aug. 13, 2010 (33 pages). [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 3:45 pm
BI (Securities Exchange Act Rule 15l-1) and Form CRS (Securities Exchange Act Rule 17a-14) become effective June 30, 2020. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:46 pm
Richard Murphy, sec. 8426 Chevron Step Zero—An Overview, 33 Fed. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:10 am
F:\SLW\SLW_075.XML f:\VHLC\052313\052313.043.xml (548657|20) 33 [Discussion Draft] 1 the ordinary and customary meaning of such claim 2 as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, the 3 prosecution history pertaining to the patent, and 4 prior judicial determinations and stipulations relat5 ing to the patent. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:00 pm
This will mean a savings of $800 for a taxpayer earning $40,000, about $33 per-pay period for workers paid twice a month. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 6:24 pm
§§ 1125(a) (1) & (c) (I), N.Y. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:12 pm
Code Regs., §§ 15301-15333 [listing 33 categorically exempt classes of projects]), the filing of the NOE here did not serve to trigger a 35-day limitations period to challenge the approval. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 4:25 am
[1] Elizabeth A. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 5:42 am
The FCC’s Media Bureau granted the substitution of UHF channel 33 for VHF channel 13 at Jacksonville, Florida. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:34 am
Thirdly, as the Court admitted (para 33), the Italian court in considering whether to give effect to an arbitration agreement between the parties is not applying a rule in the Brussels I Regulation but, instead, is applying the rules contained in the New York Convention, as a convention which (to the extent that its effect is not excluded from scope by Art 1(2)(d)) takes priority over the Regulation's rules by virtue of Art 71(1) of the Regulation. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 1:00 pm
Id. at Paras. 33-34. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 2:14 am
[1] Anderson, T. and Whitelock, D. (2004). [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 1:53 pm
It is possible, however, that that is too prescriptive and that what matters is the probability and likely gravity of damage rather than simply its imminence: Hooper v Rogers (1973) 1 Ch 43 at 30; Islington LBC v Elliott at (31), quoting Chadwick LJ in Lloyd v Symonds (1998) EWCA Civ 511, and at (33)-(34), (36); D. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 4:51 pm
” Our Charter does not have the word “inalienable,” neither in letter nor in spirit. [read post]
