Search for: "FRANKS v. STATE"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 4,748
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
The Irish State could be facing millions in claims for damages from citizens if public bodies illegally process their personal information. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:39 am
As Ann Carlson and Rick Frank have previously blogged, on December 29th 2011, U.S. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 1:11 am
Supreme Court's landmark Brown v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:44 am
To be frank, the plot of Metropolis doesn’t make a great deal of sense. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:51 am
Finally, after the conclusion of the judgment, the Court added a ‘postscript’ expressing concern at the recent re-statement by the ECtHR in X v Latvia (App no 27853/09) that Hague Convention cases demanded an in-depth examination of the entire family situation (as initially expressed, controversially, in Neulinger and Shuruk v Switzerland [2011] 1 FLR 122), and stating its conviction that such an in-depth examination is not required either by the terms of the… [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:42 am
United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Nintendo TPM triumphs in Italy https://t.co/fyg2aWOFOB -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-11-25: CIBC’s Victor Dodig says innovation is the only thing that can s… https://t.co/Vplm50rSea -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-11-25 https://t.co/HyXCsFSftC -> Supreme Court releases CBC v SODRAQ judgment https://t.co/ce9JGGVgC7 -> SCC requires tech neutrality in copyright negotiations – Canadian Lawyer Magazine https://t.co/6ModdJnyJi -> Computer… [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 4:05 pm
Claimants included seven Coronation Street actors and former boxer Frank Bruno. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 10:46 am
” Mistler v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:57 pm
(See Simmons v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:18 am
" The district court had rejected this argument, stating, "That others may have employed illegal trading strategies does not constitute a defense to a criminal indictment based on the employment of illegal trading strategies. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:28 pm
As Michael previewed this morning, the Supreme Court heard argument today in Helsinn v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 5:33 am
See Messick v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:35 pm
Ok, to be frank, it sometimes serves as numbers 1 through 5. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 5:17 am
Dyke v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:30 pm
Because as the too-often ignored case of Nixon v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:22 pm
In the LA Review of Books, Amy Brady reviews Richard Kluger’s, Indelible Ink: The Trials of John Peter Zenger and the Birth of America’s Free Press, which “tells the complex and thoroughly engaging history leading up to and including the moment of Zenger’s trial for seditious libel of a government figure,” and Stephen Rhode reviews two new books on the death penalty, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment (which provides “a clear and… [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
Boredom: The Literary History of a State of Mind. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:52 pm
” But claims of executive privilege can be overcome by a compelling government interest in disclosure and, as the Supreme Court held in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:30 pm
Because as the too-often ignored case of Nixon v. [read post]
