Search for: "German v. German" Results 3821 - 3840 of 5,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2018, 7:39 am by Florian Mueller
The previous post was about Huawei's shrinking case against Samsung, but there are some extremely interesting developments in a consumer class lawsuit against Qualcomm, related to FTC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 3:00 pm
The apple for the day, just to be sure you keep the doctor away, is Apple Inc v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:36 pm by William Ford
Matthew Kahn shared the Supreme Court’s per curiam ruling declaring the U.S. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 10:46 am by Florian Mueller
What Qualcomm wanted was to gain leverage over Apple well in advance of the Apple & contract manufacturers v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:32 am
The German refusal to allow registration of La Giaconda (the 'Mona Lisa') is a case in point. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:03 am
This decided to stay the proceedings and seek guidance from everybody's favourite court (this obviously being the CJEU), by referring five questions [available on the Curia website here] which were somehow similar to those that the Svea Court of Appeal had previously referred in Svensson [Katposts here] and the German Federal Court of Justice had referred in BestWater [here]. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 7:31 pm by Betsy McKenzie
GPG (GNU Privacy Guard) This was developed originally by German citizen Werner Koch, then by the GNU Project, which developed the GNU/Linux operating system. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:40 pm by Shamnad Basheer
Speaking of India’s contentious compulsory licensing order in Natco v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:10 am
Indeed, in Commission v France [Katpost here], the CJEU considered that ebooks may be classified as services, rather than goods under the VAT Directive. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:27 pm
This is the issue that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) had to consider in Magyar Jeti Zrt v Hungary. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 11:36 am by Katherine Pompilio
Kurup posted the unanimous court decision in FBI v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
. -- the German Association for the protection of Intellectual Property (better known by its acronym GRUR). [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 1:04 am by Florian Mueller
Some politicians sound like those communist leaders did in the late 1980s before the fall of the Iron Curtain.The problem is not going to get solved anytime soon, though I was surprised by the good news regarding the Russian Sputnik V vaccine, which appears to beat all other adenovirus vector-based COVID vaccines by a wide margin by using a different vector for the second (booster) jab (and both vectors appear to be unharmful human adenovirus strains)--the EU may end up importing that… [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 11:37 pm
  In support of this argument, the CPVO points to the ruling of the German Federal Court of Justice ruling of 11 July 2017 regarding a patent on the antiviral agent “Raltegravir”. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 11:58 am by Florian Mueller
"If only 1% of all class action plaintiffs wanted to attend the January FTC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:56 am by Larry
 The case of the day is Porsche Motorsport North America, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:30 pm
With so much else going on today, it seems almost a pity to let everyone know that the tangled world of plant variety protection was stirred to its roots by the publication of the Opinion of Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) Advocate General Jääskinen in Case C‑242/14 Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH v Gerhard und Jürgen Vogel GbR, Jürgen Vogel and Gerhard Vogel, this being a request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Mannheim, Germany, on… [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am by Alessandro Cerri
 BackgroundIn 2019, Kneipp GmbH (Kneipp), a German manufacturer of natural healing products, filed an application (the Application) to register the word mark JOYFUL BY NATURE (the Mark) as an EU trade mark (EUTM) in a number of classes, including classes 3, 4, 35, and 44, in respect of (summarily) cosmetics, perfumed/scented candles and marketing services. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 4:45 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"Reasonable suspicion" is not required under Texas law except for physical mobile tracking devices like those at issue in US v. [read post]