Search for: "MATTER OF M J S"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 4,907
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2018, 6:21 am
Posted by , on Friday, February 16, 2018 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of February 9–15, 2018. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
” The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals had "affirmed the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim of an action filed by the National Pork Producers Council and the American Farm Bureau Federation, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief on the ground that California’s Proposition 12 violates the dormant Commerce Clause in banning the sale of whole pork meat (no matter where produced) from animals confined in a manner inconsistent with… [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
The Third Edition of the Federal Judicial Center’s and the National Academies of Science, Engineering & Medicine’s Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (RMSE3d 2011) addressed confounding in several chapters, not always consistently. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
I'm talking about the claim itself. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 6:15 am
As I was riding down Fifth Avenue in a cab this morning on the way to work, looking at Central Park, I had the thought—which I have 3 days a week out of 5—that I'm one of the most fortunate people alive to be able to do what I'm doing. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Cornelio to continue to contribute toward the children's material needs.[24] Even if this matter were approached on the basis of fairness to the respondent, I would conclude that his child support obligations toward the twins continues notwithstanding that he is not their biological father. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
Heard by Danilson, P.J., and Tabor and Mullins, JJ.2 MULLINS, J. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm
If the President were to be selected by the House under the relevant provisions that we describe below, each state—no matter its population—would get exactly one vote. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 2:12 pm
A panel of experts advising the CDC is scheduled to debate the matter next week. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
J. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 11:15 am
Mostly California has gotten lawsuits and a glut of warnings with no difference in cancer or birth defect rates than those observed in states less knowledgeable on such matters.3 Some of California’s cancer rates may be a bit lower than the national rates but this outcome is largely the result of lower state rates for smoking and obesity. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 pm
I recently wrote about New York’s largest foreclosure law firm, Steven J. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:24 am
J. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
As then-Professor and now-Dean Michelle J. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
Dawson and Kathryn M. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
The ICO’s website had a news. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 5:25 am
GIBBS: My opinion on that doesn't matter. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
M. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:15 pm
The Mueller majority’s solution was to, in effect, define the word “inadvertent” as including “intentional”! [read post]
