Search for: "State v. Laws"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 157,921
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Last Week at the 6th Circuit: Substantive unreasonableness, maiden voyages, and railroaded state law
21 May 2019, 11:03 am
in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:53 am
On the First Amendment, the state argued that the law should be subject to intermediate scrutiny. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:42 am
The post R(ZLL) v SSHCLG: Everyone In a “call to action” not a policy appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:08 am
(R (Lumba) v Secretary of state for the Home Department (JUSTICE intervening) [2011] UKSC 12). [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 2:59 am
Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice and Others Supreme Court "The presence of two unelected, non-voting members in the legislature of the Channel Island of Sark which had 28 voting members democratically elected by an electorate of under 500 was not incompatible with article 3 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights, [...] [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 9:37 pm
" And online at The Atlantic, law professor Garrett Epps has an essay titled "A Major Church-State Ruling That Shouldn't Have Happened: In Trinity v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 6:43 am
After overwhelming support in the state legislature, Connecticut is about to become the fifth state with a comprehensive privacy law, as SB 6 awaits signature by Governor Ned Lamont. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 5:13 am
In Quarty v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:49 am
The law has been violated and someone has to be held accountable for it and the State cannot get away with this. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:35 pm
Northeastern University School of Law Professor Brook K. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
In Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:40 pm
Click on the graph for a larger view.California has (1) court orders overriding state law to release prisoners because of overcrowded conditions caused by the Legislature's failure to build enough prison space, (2) the "realignment" program moving prisoners from state prison to overcrowded county jails where they are either released or push out prisoners who would otherwise be in jail, and (3) Proposition 47, which reduced many felonies to… [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 6:14 am
State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 9:26 am
In Part 2, we’ll examine the reasoning behind this decision, and how it might impact not only divorces, but state law in general. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
The plaintiffs argued that Lagas v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:22 pm
Clark v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 4:10 am
In Mughal v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 1:06 pm
Since Sherwood I, two California state courts of appeal have reached the opposite conclusion and held that assignees can bring preference actions under California law because the Bankruptcy Code does not preempt state preference law. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 1:06 pm
Since Sherwood I, two California state courts of appeal have reached the opposite conclusion and held that assignees can bring preference actions under California law because the Bankruptcy Code does not preempt state preference law. [read post]
