Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Heard" Results 3821 - 3840 of 7,747
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2015, 3:04 pm by Lovechilde
  Today the Supreme Court heard argument in the case of Glossip v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 1:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
From worrying about casting aside a “millennia” of cultural norm and habit about who can marry, to wondering about whether America has had enough time to debate the issue, to a somewhat testy defense of the dignity that gay and lesbian couples would have in marriage, Kennedy appeared to have moved from hesitancy toward acceptance as the Court heard nearly two-and-a-half hours of argument in the cases that are known as Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:34 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
The court heard two-and-half hours of oral arguments in Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:44 pm by Amy Howe
On the same day that the Court issued its ruling in the California case, it also issued its opinion in a case called United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 11:20 am by Kimberly Bennett
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] heard oral arguments [day call, PDF] on Monday in Kingsley v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 11:22 am
 This Kat has just heard that Bosnia and Herzegovina is celebrating with a workshop on "Removing Copyright Infringing Content from the Internet", at the University of Travnik Faculty of Law on 27 April at 10 am. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:52 pm by sgottlieb
That’s bad enough for people who are just trying to be treated fairly. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:21 pm by John Jascob
The SEC found that the adviser’s late-afternoon trades were intended to mark the close in order to reflect higher portfolio balances in clients’ monthly account statements (Koch v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am by Amy Howe
  It heard oral arguments for the second time in Johnson v. [read post]