Search for: "Application of Stevens"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 4,212
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2008, 4:00 am
Considering their joining the dissenting camp in Alameda Books and their overall records, it seems a good bet that CBS will find a friend in Justices Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg and Breyer. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Stevens, No. 05-2497 Conviction for selling depictions of animal cruelty is vacated, and the statute itself, 18 U.S.C. section 48, is declared unconstitutional, where: 1) the criminalization of depictions of animal cruelty, rather than of the acts of cruelty themselves, is a content-based regulation on speech; 2) the speech in question does not constitute a new category of unprotected speech; and 3) the government has not shown that the statute is narrowly tailored, using the least… [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 10:42 am
Renneisen, Deputy Attorney General; Steven R. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 8:21 am
There is, however, an analogous New Jersey statute, and recently a New York court considered its extraterritorial application in New York cases. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 1:48 am
Stevens, 462 F.3d 1169, 1170 (9th Cir. 2006). [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 4:48 pm
Application Requirements 1. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 3:00 pm
Or at the very least, it was not unreasonable for them to believe that the sponsors embraced the ambiguity as a necessary means of holding together a disparate coalition that had differing expectations about its application. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
The Case Against The Death Penaltyby Hugo Adam Bedau --------------------------------------------------------------------------------ContentsPrefaceIntroductionDeterrenceUnfairnessInevitability of ErrorBarbarityRetributionFinancial CostsPublic OpinionAbolition TrendsFor Further Information & ReferenceNotes--------------------------------------------------------------------------------PrefaceHugo Adam Bedau is Fletcher Professor of Philosophy at Tufts University. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 10:34 pm
Law Judge Steven Fish issued his decision March 4, 2008. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
Writing in dissent, Breyer and Stevens, JJ., set forth a three-step critique. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
Writing in dissent, Breyer and Stevens, JJ., set forth a three-step critique. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
Raising the Standard (of Review) Beyond applicability to the states or not, the standard of review is uncertain for laws that differ from the District of Columbia handgun ban that was nullified. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:01 pm
It was the unequal application of the law that led most directly to its downfall. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:57 am
"Given the fact that [the plaintiffs] have advanced a broad attack ... seeking relief that would invalidate the statute in all its applications, they bear a heavy burden of persuasion," wrote Justice John Paul Stevens. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 4:51 pm
Justice Stevens argued that the phrase "the people" could mean roughly &q [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:00 am
Applicant argued, to no avail, that consumers would not be deceived but would recognize the term as merely an expansion of Applicant's well-known cosmetics mark to a new product line. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 9:09 am
Supreme Court justices in their 70s and John Paul Stevens at 88, as many as five justices could step down in the next four years. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:51 pm
Neither section is applicable in this case. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:53 pm
Further, if the Stevens individual right model were correct, what would be the practical applications of that right? [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 7:46 am
Deborah HellmanJustice Stevens, in the parts of his opinion in Davis v. [read post]
