Search for: "Deter v. Deter"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 5,290
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2011, 10:29 am
Personal Audio, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
In a concurring opinion, Justice Sotomayor agreed that the primary purpose of the exclusionary rule is “to deter future Fourth Amendment violations. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:12 pm
The main issue decided by the United States Supreme Court in Turner v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 11:29 am
In Pure Power Boot Camp v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 5:38 am
No amount of scepticism about the fertility of a theory can deter its use unless the sceptic can point to another route by which the scientific problem of regulation can be studied successfully. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 9:01 pm
It reasons that the “sole purpose” of the exclusionary rule “is to deter future Fourth Amendment violations,” ante, at 6. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm
Justice Alito may have been in the minority in the JDB case, but he wrote the majority opinion for the Court in Davis v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 1:11 pm
Yesterday's SCOTUS decision in Davis v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:08 pm
They're warehouses.Yesterday, the unanimous Supreme Court said (Tapia v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:34 am
The rule was enacted to deter attorneys from filing frivolous litigation. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:29 am
(a) The exclusionary rule’s sole purpose is to deter future Fourth Amendment violations, e.g., Herring v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:00 am
In Davis v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:23 am
Section 102(g) contains the basic rule for deter- mining priority. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 5:51 am
How do you deter an alcoholic? [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:48 am
The exclusionary rule’s sole purpose is to deter future Fourth Amendment violations, e.g., Herring v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Thursday ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-2 in Davis v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:21 am
Kentucky and Teague v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:55 am
In Bond v. [read post]
