Search for: "In re Doe" Results 3841 - 3860 of 107,459
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2008, 10:40 am
So if you're not a fan of judicial sentencing, but even less of legislative sentencing, which still trumps prosecutorial king-iness, does that mean you are a fan of sentencing guidelines? [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 10:28 am by Lawrence Taylor
", provide an excellent analysis of these important issues:  …We take for granted that not being able to walk a straight line or stand on one leg means that you’re drunk, and that being drunk means it’s unacceptably dangerous to drive. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
In all likelihood it spells the death neal for HB 5557 during the current legislative session which does not end until June 30. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:14 am by Jack Bogdanski
Pomerantz, who refers to herself as a lawyer, does not appear to be a member of the State Bar. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:00 am by Gene Quinn
That does not mean we’re going to issue more or less, it means that we’re going to take extra steps to make sure we’re on the same page as the applicant. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 8:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Wertheim, 541 F.2d 257, 267 (CCPA 1976); In re Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575 (Fed. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 12:39 am
Because the right to a jury trial is not constitutionally required in the juvenile context, its "absence ... does not automatically disqualify juvenile adjudications for purposes of the Apprendi exception. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:54 am
That seems to be what happened in In re Ruiz, a case from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:00 pm by admin
Fortunately, the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Law does allow for an injured employee to re-open, set aside, or vacate a prior agreement under limited circumstances. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:00 pm by jerry sisk
Fortunately, the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Law does allow for an injured employee to re-open, set aside, or vacate a prior agreement under limited circumstances. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:29 pm
 This does not reflect highly on the Court's understanding of contemporary realities or the profound difference between (1) what Glass has done, and (2) what most attorneys do. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 2:18 pm by Brad Kuhn
California’s heat-wave continues, and so does the drought. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 6:08 am
We all know we should pull over and rest when we're sleepy, but how often does that really happen? [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:35 pm
Buried in the fine print of every customer’s contract, these clauses pre-emptively block consumers from going to court if the bank does something wrong. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 9:53 am
We might have suffered a particularly bad drought here in Texas this year, but as a personal injury lawyer I know that when it eventually does rain in DFW – it pours! [read post]