Search for: "Law v. USA"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 6,906
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2009, 6:12 am
F. of L. files antitrust suit against Merck, alleging fraudulent procurement of a patent, improper listing of patent in Orange Book (Patent Docs) Singulair (Montelukast) – US: Merck get injunction preventing Teva from selling generic Montelukast: Merck Sharp & Dohme Pharmaceuticals SRL v Teva Pharmaceuticals USA (The IP Factor) (IP Watchdog) (SmartBrief) (SmartBrief) (GenericsWeb) [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:47 pm
Thus, the Court of Appeals properly reviewed the District Court’s conclusions of law de novo. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
This week saw the ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Experience Hendrix LLC v Purple Haze Records Ltd and others [2007] EWCA Civ 501, a decision of Lords Justices Keene, Jacob and Toulson on Thursday 24 May 2007.Musical megastar Jimi Hendrix (left), a US citizen, gave performances between 1967 and his death in 1970 in (among other places) the UK, Sweden and the USA. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm
In my last post, I said that the European Court of Justice decision in Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 6:24 am
Findlay v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 10:57 am
.; and Kim Kardashian West v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am
At The Washington Times, Alex Swoyer reports that Seila Law v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 3.0) 1. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm
AMP v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:26 am
As a result, condition (v) was deemed satisfied.Turning to likelihood of confusion (condition (vi)), the court recalled that this requires a global appreciation, taking into account all relevant factors, and must be undertaken from the perspective of the average consumer (see Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation [2016] EWCA Civ 41).Benefit submitted that no such likelihood of confusion would subsist because of case law (notably Nestle… [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:51 am
Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:32 pm
Supreme Court Ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:01 am
Airgas USA, LLC: Case Background In Fisher v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:15 pm
[5] Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:25 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
Texas law requires loan agreements over $50,000 to be in writing and signed by the party to be bound. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
” The New York Law Journal analyzes the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 12:49 pm
Prior to the ruling in FTC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:20 pm
Scott Nelson has this post at the Consumer Law & Policy Blog about the Court's unanimous decision in Watson v. [read post]
