Search for: "Lee v. State " Results 3841 - 3860 of 5,083
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2011, 2:37 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) (H) v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 730 (29 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Football Dataco Ltd & Ors v Sportradar GmbH & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 330 (29 March 2011) Schütz (UK) Ltd v Werit (UK) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 303 (29 March 2011) Gemstar- Tvguide International Inc & Ors v Virgin Media Ltd & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 302 (29 March 2011) Faulkner, R (on the application of) v Secretary of… [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 8:26 am by PaulKostro
KAPLAN, Ph.D., TOBY KAUFMAN, Ph.D., JOY ANNA LEE SILBERG, J.N. and S.N., and D.N., App. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:37 am
SourcesFirst instance ruling in Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd [2010] FCA 24 (4 February 2010) hereAppeal decision in Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd [2011] FCAFC 23 (24 February 2011) here [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 9:00 am by Record on Appeal
Case in point:  Reason Lee, James Washington, and Michael Moore v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:55 am by Layla Kuhl
  In People v Lee, the Court denied the prosecutor’s motion for adjournment of oral argument, stating that it appeared that “an appointed special prosecutor is available to present the argument. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
SG and 35 state AGs have weighed in claiming that data mining does not merit First Amendment protection. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
Although our two blogs have previously quibbled on musical issues, we were elated to hear that Steve is a big fan of Bruce Springsteen and the late, great Arthur Lee. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm by Marie Louise
(IP finance) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC: In re Katz (part 2): Indefiniteness of computer processes (Patently-O) CAFC: Altair illustrates how to win by losing: Altair v Leddynamics (IPBiz) District Court E D Wisconsin: In Re Seagate does not dictate standard for pleading willful infringement claim: Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, et. al. v. [read post]