Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 3841 - 3860
of 29,868
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2017, 6:02 am
Found. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
From United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 6:36 am
It held that "A determination by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders that a person who committed an offense in another state must register in New York is reviewable in a proceeding to determine the offender's risk level. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 12:23 pm
The case is entitled State of Nevada et al. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 8:43 am
Recently, two cases State of Netherlands v Urgenda (December 20, 2019) and Juliana v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS/TAX EVASIONUnited States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Loving v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:20 pm
However, Congress provided an escape valve in case those levels could not be reached and called for a determination by EPA of the "projected volume of cellulosic biofuel production" for each calendar year. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
Idaho; Sept. 30, 2010) I blogged in June about a CAN-SPAM case in the District of Idaho involving CAN-SPAM and state law claims asserted by Melaleuca, a "multi-level marketing company," against Daryl Hansen. [read post]
25 May 2022, 12:53 pm
In Trevino v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:48 am
At the state level, its the New York Division of Human Rights. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:35 am
Put otherwise, at the restaurant level, every restaurant to which the Law applies is an in-state business; and at the chain level, the Law applies equally regardless of where a franchise is headquartered. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 4:33 am
The Court of Appeals reversed the WCC citing a 1955 Supreme Court case, Bagwell v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 7:41 pm
The Bush administration has over the past few years circumvented Capitol Hill by weakening regulatory agencies' safety rules and adding introductions, called preambles, to public-safety regulations that effectively prohibit plaintiffs from suing at the state level, where safety standards can be tougher than those at the federal level. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 8:12 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 9:25 am
In Windsor v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 5:22 pm
The state of the law after the Supreme Court ruling in State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 7:52 am
The doctrine, originating in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 5:18 am
Since this is a United States Supreme Court case it is binding at the state level. [read post]
