Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2010, 4:11 pm
by Mark D. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:03 pm
Crews v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 7:35 pm
Liao has not yet answered the ABA’s complaint.The case cite is American Board of Anesthesiology, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:27 pm
In addition, both of the earlier decisions stated that in order for prior use of a mark in Canada to be grounds for successfully expunging a registration, such prior use must have occurred in the same geographic area where the applicant used its mark; otherwise there could have been no likelihood of confusion at the time the application was filed. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 9:03 am
” Virginia State Bd. of Pharmacy v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
Do Italians really got what sharing services among EU Member States is about, she wonders? [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
Katfriend and occasional guest contributor Aaron Wood tells all.* Invalidating an absent litigant's trade marks: yes, of course it can be doneJeremy further reflects on Roederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:48 pm
After nearly 90 minutes of debate in Arizona v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 1:39 pm
See Hard Candy Cases, LLC, v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 1:39 pm
See Hard Candy Cases, LLC, v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:52 am
A Federal court in California has struck down a ban on gay marriage in the state, marking the first step on a path to a United States Supreme Court decision on the issue. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:19 am
Anderson: States cannot disqualify candidates for federal offices from the ballot under Section 3. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 2:08 am
Nicholas J points out, however, that the High Court stated that s 123 embodies the principle in Champagne Hiedsieck. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:20 am
State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:56 am
By Eric Goldman Taylor v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:20 am
In Alcazar v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 4:30 am
" United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:13 pm
In the sub-headline, the Hatch-Waxman Act is referred to as outdated.KSR v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:50 pm
In the Wall Street Journal, Mark H. [read post]
