Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 8,482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
City of Toronto v Uber Canada Inc. et al., 2015 ONSC 3572 [1] This evening, a tourist from London visiting Toronto will take out her smartphone and press a button to activate an “app” that she downloaded months or even years ago. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:22 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-02467-EAS-NMK (S.D. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 1:33 pm
The Working Group on business and human rights has the pleasure to invite States, business, civil society and other stakeholders to the: Fourth annual United Nations Forum on Business and Human Rights 16 to 18 November 2015 Palais des Nations, Geneva, Switzerland http://www.ohchr.org/2015ForumBHR The Working Group noted: Building on the previous events, the fourth annual Forum will focus on:Strengthening multi-stakeholder dialogue and engagementDiscussing effective… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
* Washington Redskins' Trade Marks tackled: disparaging, says District CourtJani writes up Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 10:44 am
United States Food and Drug Admin., Civ. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 4:35 am
., et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
” United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:14 am
Having duked the matter out in the United States Patents and Trademarks Office, and subsequently at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the matter has moved on to the District Court of Virginia, where the decision was handed down only a few days ago.Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:33 am
Amanda Blackhorse et al., Case No.1:14-cv-01043-GBL-IDD (July 8, 2015).On cross-motions for summary judgment, the court ruled that the disparagement provision of Section 2(a) does not violate the First Amendment because Section 2(a) "does not implicate the First Amendment" and because "the federal trademark registration program is government speech and is therefore exempt from First Amendment scrutiny. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 11:04 am
This decision was based in part on the Florida Supreme Court decision in McCall, et al v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 11:04 am
This decision was based in part on the Florida Supreme Court decision in McCall, et al v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:20 am
The case, styled as North Broward Hospital District, et. al. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 11:47 am
” Much to ponder as the United States begins its 240th year of democracy. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:30 am
., et al., 2015COA65 (Colo. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:30 am
., et al., 2015COA65 (Colo. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:01 pm
ALBANY, GA—United States of America v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
The holding of the case, Obergefell et al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
The holding of the case, Obergefell et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 12:34 pm
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States held, in Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 12:34 pm
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States held, in Obergefell v. [read post]
