Search for: "A B" Results 3861 - 3880 of 158,395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2008, 12:29 pm
 BH S&B Holdings, created by hedge funds and former owners of Steve & Barry's, filed for bankruptcy protection today in Manhattan federal court. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:53 am by Administrator
Section 902 of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA ’06) added Code section 401(k)(13), 401(m)(12) and 414(w), providing for automatic enrollment in 401(k), 403(b) and 457(b) plans, including Qualified Automatic Contribution Arrangements (QACA) and Eligible Automatic Contribution Arrangements (EACA). [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:48 am
The "value" of QLL is about the same as it was the last time I checked (B$6,125). [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 5:25 am
Although Chandel B., Sr. claimed his consent was required before his child -- Chandel B. -- could be adopted, the New York County Family Court disagreed, and awarded custody of the minor to Social Services. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:22 pm by Mayela Celis
The Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) has announced that the Guide to Good Practice under the Child Abduction Convention: Part VI – Article 13(1)(b) is now available in both English and French. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 9:23 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
Our contrary tendency to see experiments—but not untested innovations foisted on us by powerful people—as involving risk, uncertainty, and power asymmetries is what I call the A/B illusion in my article. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:31 am
My new working paper on Estimating the Compliance Costs of Securities Regulation: A Bunching Analysis of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404(b) brings both a novel dataset and a new empirical approach to bear on this important question. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 9:11 am
The issue in the case involved the income component of the "projected disposable income" calculation under section 1325(b)(1)(B). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Few attorneys can boast a career spanning over four decades dedicated to public service like that of the Honorable Ira B. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” [Emphasis supplied].In contrast, if a public employee is not subject to any of the provisions of CSL §75-b(2)(a) or §75-b(2)(b), the individual may commence “an action in a court of competent jurisdiction under the same terms and conditions as set out in Labor Law Article 25-c. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In addition, Supreme Court opined that it "f[ound] that the conduct demonstrated by [College X] towards [Student B] during the initial course of this investigation was a clear violation of [Student B's] constitutional rights. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:23 am by John Jascob
Peirce and Roisman explained that they disagreed with the majority’s application of Exchange Act Section 13(b)(2)(B) to conduct that is not more closely related to accounting matters. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In addition, Supreme Court opined that it "f[ound] that the conduct demonstrated by [College X] towards [Student B] during the initial course of this investigation was a clear violation of [Student B's] constitutional rights. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In addition, Supreme Court opined that it "f[ound] that the conduct demonstrated by [College X] towards [Student B] during the initial course of this investigation was a clear violation of [Student B's] constitutional rights. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In addition, Supreme Court opined that it "f[ound] that the conduct demonstrated by [College X] towards [Student B] during the initial course of this investigation was a clear violation of [Student B's] constitutional rights. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:28 am by Steve Kalar
   Shill was charged with using the internet to entice a minor, 18 USC § 2422(b). [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Some supporters of the mild penalty plan would regret their actions: they would rather stay with A, or even go back to 0, because they strongly oppose B; but their endorsement of A back when B wasn't even discussed now makes B possible. [read post]