Search for: "COOPER v. STATE" Results 3861 - 3880 of 7,362
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
If pursued, the DOJ’s probe could be the biggest antitrust hit taken by the movie theater industry since the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
Last up is Wright v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm by Erin Miller
Creech (1993)), let States limit the uses juries make of mitigation (Graham v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am by Ken
But when cooperating with the state might suit his needs, Kimberlin does so. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:17 am by Alex Wohl
Specifically, for “intentional or willful” violations, the United States is liable for “actual damages. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
First American Title Insurance Company 14-106Issue: Whether federal due process requires state-court judges, in reviewing jury-awarded punitive damages for constitutional excessiveness, to: (1) use de novo review to set punitive damages at the level they find appropriate, without viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, based on Cooper Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 8:30 am by Andrew Hamm
Three petitions ask the justices to review disputes between the Department of Justice and state or local governments that do not cooperate with federal immigration authorities. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
Here is the story:When filing the parent application, Virgin designated all available Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) contracting states. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:08 pm by Ilene Cooper
One of the better known instances in which the Surrogate’s Court undertook this role was Stortecky v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:08 pm by Ilene Cooper
One of the better known instances in which the Surrogate’s Court undertook this role was Stortecky v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
” Although a state supreme court justice sustained PERB’s ruling, the Appellate Division reversed, holding that “the broad scope of the Commissioner’s authority to approve cooperative services contracts could not overcome the Taylor Law’s mandate for public sector employment collective bargaining [Matter of Vestal Employees Association, 260 AD2d 699]. [read post]