Search for: "California v. Force" Results 3861 - 3880 of 6,450
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2013, 5:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
These bounty orders remained in effect until at least 1868, when their constitutionality was finally questioned by the Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 11:46 am by Eric
For an example of how publication of a copyrighted work might "complete" a website's contract with a teen, see the 2008 AV v. iParadigms case. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:00 am by Nassiri Law
Equal Employee Opportunity Commission More Blog Entries: California Discrimination Lawsuits Impacted by Wal-Mart v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 7:16 am by Joy Waltemath
On remand from the California Supreme Court, a superior court judge  certified a meal period subclass in a long-running class action wage suit against Brinker Restaurant Corp (Hohnbaum v Brinker Restaurant Corp, September 26, 2013, Dato, W). [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:45 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
- Macleans.ca Omar Khadr set to make first public appearance tomorrow during Edmonton court hearing How "big data" will help lawyers more effectively practice law Canada: Monarchist League hails court ruling upholding oath to Queen Testimony ends in 21st week of trial against concert promoter over Michael Jackson's death ABA task force proposes scrutiny of law school funding, pricing and accreditation standards Identifying the Problems With Law Schools Former Edmonton Oilers owner Peter… [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 8:32 am by Florian Mueller
On November 12, 2013, a limited damages retrial will start in the first Apple v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 8:00 am by Jane Chong
District Court’s refusal to enjoin the government from force-feeding hunger-strikers at the detention camp filed their reply in Aamer v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:03 pm by Daniel B. Cohen
Farmers are supposed to be able to follow the Food Safety Modernization Act without being forced to hire consultants or private certifiers. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 9:45 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 125946 (WD KY, Sept. 3, 2013), a Kentucky federal district court allowed a Jewish inmate to proceed with his claim that his free exercise and RLUIPA rights were violated when he was forced to shave his head while in segregation, in violation of his religious beliefs.In Watts v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 2:28 pm
 There's a California statute (Section 22210 of the Penal Code) that specifically says that you're not allowed to sell or possess a billy. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Bingham of Ohio and the Historical Context of the Fourteenth Amendment" Cynthia Nicoletti (Assistant Professor of Law, Mississippi College School of Law) "The Disputed Constitutionality of the Emancipation Proclamation"11:00-12:30 | Panel TwoStephen Mihm (University of Georgia), chairPaul Kens (Professor of Political Science, Texas State University at San Marcos) "Big Business and the Reconstruction Amendments: Lessons from Munn v. [read post]