Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 7,399
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2013, 8:53 am
Green asked Young to consent to an x-ray, which Young declined. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:22 am
Doctors then x-rayed Eckert again; no narcotics were found. 8. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:31 am
The ER doctor ordered an X-ray, which produced nothing, and then conducted a digital rectal exam over Eckert’s objection. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:56 am
So... does that mean students are supposed to talk about it or not talk about it? [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am
”[i] In this instance Johnson refers to H.A. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:27 am
“I don’t know if sequestration is going to happen, but I worry about how astrophysics will be funded, and realize $50 million in savings, this year,” he said. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 5:15 am
I have no good response to the "this puts a nickel in the pocket of bad-group-X" other than, perhaps, donating a quarter to good-group-Y. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 12:04 pm
So how then does this more effectively link a particular defendant to a crime scene? [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:49 am
Why does it matter? [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 2:00 am
Here’s a recipe for disaster: I. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 1:05 pm
This means both parties have come to a compromise to take x, y, & z now rather than continue fighting and risk a less satisfying result later. [read post]
House Panel Holds Hearings on Bills to Reduce Impediments to Capital Formation; Possible JOBS Act II
29 Oct 2013, 7:15 am
Nydia Velazquez (D-NY), is substantially similar to H.R. 1800 except that it does not direct the SEC to revise Rules 418 and 14a-101 and Regulation FD Rule 103. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:53 am
X, § 4(c), Fla. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:13 am
For example, the correlative of a right is a duty, and if X holds a right against Y, it necessarily follows that Y then owes X a du [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 4:16 pm
’ The labeling must also contain a description of available data on the effect of the drug on the later growth, development, and functional maturation of the child. 21 CFR § 201.57 (c)(9)(i)(A)(1) (April 2012). [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:03 am
Why Should I Bother? [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
What does that mean? [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
What does that last part mean? [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 6:00 pm
The objective finding of an x-ray can’t be disputed. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm
South Africa, England), this does not appear to apply for the chrysotile industry in North America. [read post]
