Search for: "GEORGE v. STATE"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 7,214
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2014, 7:47 am
United States and BG Group v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 6:55 am
Ben also posted video from a recent “Munk debate” on state surveillance. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:14 am
On April 22, 2014 the Supreme Court issued its decision in Navarette v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:14 am
On April 22, 2014 the Supreme Court issued its decision in Navarette v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:54 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:54 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm
George Garcy a/k/a Jorge Garcia, and Angelo CuomoCase number: 11-cv-02282 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York)Case filed: May 11, 2011Qualifying judgment/order: February 7, 2014 3/24/2014 6/23/2014 2014-31 SEC v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 10:20 am
Even in Brown v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:55 pm
Bush in Bush v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 10:50 am
Evans in 1996 and United States v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:30 am
In NFIB v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 2:48 pm
To the contrary, I agree with the Court’s decision in Marsh v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
See generally Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith, and Douglas Altman, Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context (2001). [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:24 am
This Kat believes that Member States are free to legislate in relation to exceptions or limitations to the right of adaptation, but these must be intended narrowly, ie as limited to what can be considered as pure adaptations, not transformative uses of a work that nonetheless also involve its simple reproduction.For instance, while it is arguable that creating a play from a novel may fall exclusively within the scope of the right of adaptation, it may be more… [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm
Ongoing litigation in United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:13 am
R (George) v SSHD, heard 4 March 2014. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:39 am
As stated earlier in this judgment, I did not find Mr. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 9:39 am
LEXIS 56786 (ED CA, April 22, 2014), a California federal district court permitted a Muslim inmate to move forward with his claim that his rights under RLUIPA were violated by a rule that barred inmates serving a sentence of life without possibility of parole from having conjugal visits.In George v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
Polsby (George Mason)Lucas A. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
Polsby (George Mason)Lucas A. [read post]
