Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 178,510
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 10:47 am
Dilution causes of action are normally brought when the defendant’s use of the mark causes either: “Blurring”: by which the connection in consumers’ minds between the plaintiff’s mark and the plaintiff’s goods or services is weakened. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:40 am
In the 19th century, the divide was easier because plaintiffs had to choose whether to file their action in law or in equity. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:07 am
At the time of the alleged abuse, plaintiffs ranged in ages from eight to fourteen. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:05 am
As far as not knowing the death was due to another’s negligence, the statute of limitations begins when negligence is discovered. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:57 am
Apr. 12, 2024) The district court found that use of a competitor’s photos in comparative advertising was fair use; the court of appeals affirms on the alternative ground that no copyright damages can be traced to the use of the photos, holding that a plaintiff seeking defendant’s profits must show a nexus between the use of the copyrighted works and the profits. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:56 am
To find no standing would deprive federal plaintiffs of the remedy the statute set out. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:52 am
” The moment of accrual need not be specific to a plaintiff, as the cause of action may not be confined to that plaintiff, but may be common to many plaintiffs. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:14 am
The defendant in a slip and fall case relied on Nova Scotia’s Rule 49.09 to withhold security footage from the plaintiff. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
You are a plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:25 am
Crediting Moab’s allegations as true, the panel found that IMO 2020’s significant restriction of No. 6 fuel oil use was known to Macquarie and reasonably likely to have material effects on Macquarie’s financial condition or results of operation. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:42 am
Nor would the new zoning law affect plaintiff's religious practices. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
As such, the court granted the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:37 am
” While Neil acknowledged that Helen had standing (she remained employed by the Corporation), Neil argued that Helen’s dissolution petition should be dismissed because she has “adequate alternative remedies,”—she is a plaintiff in at least one other plenary action seeking money damages arising from the same “oppressive conduct. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:30 am
The jury awarded the plaintiff $1,500,000. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Plaintiffs’ claims, however, are not that defendant was hired to discover Kenneth’s wrongdoing, but rather [*3]that information obtained by defendant during its business interactions with Kenneth and information used by defendant in order to prepare tax returns and financial statements put defendant on notice about the impropriety of Kenneth’s loans to himself such that defendant had a duty to inform plaintiffs of the questionable payments. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:59 am
BackgroundThe claimant in this case, which is anonymised in the Court's judgment, had asked the AI program DALL-E to create an image for the claimant's website. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
California Corporations Code Section 25118(b) provides an exemption from the state's usury limitations for loans. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:00 pm
If you work for an employer, it’s pretty simple. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 3:18 pm
The plaintiff in this case was rejected for all of his applications (we have no indication of whether he was qualified for the jobs for which he applied). [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm
Haas, 363 Ill.App.3d 396, 406 (1st Dist. 2005) (refusing to modify unreasonable and unfair restrictive covenant); Lawrence & Allen, 292 Ill.App.3d at 141 (“as a result of the significant deficiencies in the post-employment restrictive covenant, we decline plaintiff’s request to make any modifications”); North American Paper Co. v. [read post]
