Search for: "United States v. John"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 11,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2022, 12:54 pm
Arizona: In this death penalty case, the justices will decide whether the Arizona Supreme Court’s ruling that a state rule of criminal procedure barred the defendant, John Cruz, from obtaining relief is an adequate and independent state-law ground for the judgment against him.Jones v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:08 am
In State v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
United States, 11-10835, was put on hold to allow a Fourth Circuit case, Shrader v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:11 am
United States, in which a plurality concluded that a fish is not a tangible object, at least for purposes of criminal liability under the Sarbanes-Oxley act? [read post]
31 May 2013, 6:33 pm
Part V then considers the way Western secular states have facilitated this new role for religion in places like Afghanistan. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:34 am
He challenged his convictions on a number of grounds, and contended that his sentence of life without the possibility of parole is unconstitutional under the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Miller v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:58 pm
§ 1182(f), authorizing the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:23 pm
On May 26, 2010, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Deere & Co. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 5:48 am
United States, 545 U.S. 353, 125 S.Ct. 2478, 162 L.Ed.2d 343 (2005). [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:07 am
United States, the Court will consider whether to uphold a Pennsylvania man’s criminal conviction for threatening statements made on Facebook. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:04 am
See Elektra v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:54 am
For example, federal courts always have jurisdiction over suits to which the United States is a party. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Barrett’s willingness to look past possible abuse of discretion and violation of due process decried by the dissenting judges echoes Chief Justice John Roberts’s deferential reasoning in Trump v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
This title phrase, glommed from the non-precedential decision of the Third Circuit in State Troopers v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:45 pm
Woodcock of the United States District Court of Maine in Bangor recently ruled in favor of whistleblower plaintiff Dennis Manske, by upholding Magistrate Judge John Rich's decision to allow Mr. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:27 pm
See United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:11 am
Justice Sotomayor dissents in Trump v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 2:44 am
The National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha’is of the United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:04 pm
As the Supreme Court struck down the core of the so-called "Defense of Marriage Act" in United States v. [read post]
