Search for: "*in Re Jones" Results 3881 - 3900 of 5,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2017, 9:51 am by Derek T. Muller
Instead, we're pointing out that lower bar scores correlate with higher discipline rates; and lowering the score further would likely result in still higher discipline rates. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 1:47 am
 In this context, the sage words of Paul Jones (Jones & Co., Toronto) are always worth noting, even though the IPKat and Merpel do not always agree with them. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Jones stated, “The Court must acknowledge the grave reality that is likely to occur without injunctive relief. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 12:45 am by Tessa Shepperson
And Owen Jones’s “The establishment and how they get away with it”  – again a ‘reach-for book’ for people with my leanings but I remain to be convinced of Mr Jones, who the book’s jacket describes as “Our generation’s George Orwell”, which is I think stretching it a bit. [read post]
12 May 2007, 3:41 pm
"If you're going to support that kind of valuation, it should have that kind of growth. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:59 am by Gabe Acevedo
Instead, Cox gave the following response:“You’re damn right I advocate deadly force. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:05 pm
"We first tested ground beef and now we're testing trim. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:00 am by Dan Bressler
.'” “Swiss verien firms risk losing business if they’re required to disclose conflicts related to affiliates’ work. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:13 pm by David Kravets
The conviction was based on court warrants to search and find drugs in the locations where Jones had traveled. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 3:20 am by INFORRM
Indeed, the joint judgment of Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow and Hayne JJ in Dow Jones & Co. [read post]
22 May 2009, 7:45 am
Jones and Hall both consider PCOS to have substantially stronger security, and to be substantially better overall, than DREs with parallel testing.) [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:08 am by Matt Sundquist
  First, he pointed out that the decision allows unions and corporations to fund “magic words” advertisements – which, unlike advocacy ads that might encourage voters to “call candidate Jones about issue x,” encourage listeners to “vote for candidate Jones. [read post]