Search for: "IN RE A W-M"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 4,154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2010, 3:40 am
According to the December 30, 2009 Bankruptcy Court transcript, Attorney Thomas M. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:39 pm
Volcani had re-interviewed the parents, the new spouses, and the minor's preschool teacher and therapist. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:00 am
No Re-Verifying Current Employees Refrain from re-verifying the employment eligibility of a current employee at a time or in a manner not required by the employment eligibility verification provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, 8 USC § 1324a(b), or that would violate any E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding the employer has entered into with the Department of Homeland Security. * * * To be sure, AB 450 offers sops feigning fealty to federal… [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
Our excellent pro bono counsel Jeffrey M. [read post]
3 May 2024, 2:58 am
Other regulatory reports in England & Wales in this period (Ormrod, Benson, Marr, Wood) barely acknowledged the idea of legal edtech, let alone explored it.1 The Legal Education & Training Review (LETR) was the first report to comment extensively on legal edtech in E+W. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:53 pm
“And if you’re saying that I can be bought for $5,000, I’m offended. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm
Button, 371 U.S. 415 (1963) and In re Primus, 436 U.S. 412 (1978), as turning on the associational interests of the lawyers qua lawyers. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
F & M Equipment, Ltd., f/k/a Furnival Machinery Company, __ F.3d __ (3rd Cir. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
In addition, we’re still waiting to hear which Conference the Court selects for the rescheduled Davis v. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 4:25 am
– A Critical Overview of the Hague Preliminary Draft on Judgments”, Yearbook of Private International Law 17 (2015/2016), pp 1-31 Bonomi, Andrea; Mariottini, Cristina M. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
I’m no fan of the Court’s formulaic tiers of review. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am
A year earlier, in 1989, the New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed a judgment against du Pont in a case brought by employees who established at trial that their employer had intentionally harmed them with respect to their use of asbestos.[3] One of the plaintiffs’ key “state of the art” witnesses throughout the 1980s and 1990s was Gerrit W. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 6:55 am
” See, Bernard W. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Rather than setting cases for re-argument, the Court 4-4'd cases including Friedrichs v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The SEC explained: [W]e believe that NEPA requires and authorizes the Commission to consider the promotion of environmental protection along with other considerations in determining whether to require affirmative disclosures by registrants under the Securities Act and the Securities and Exchange Act . . . . [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am
September 25, 2024In a family offense proceeding, the fact that some of the alleged conduct occurred years earlier is not dispositive, as “the issue is the imminence of the danger and not the age of the threat” However, the frequency and age of the alleged conduct is relevant in assessing whether there is “a pattern of imminent and ongoing danger to the” petitioner In Matter of Boltz v Geraci, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2024 WL 4229688, 2024 N.Y. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am
If you’re communicating “I’m a generic of drug X,” we might have more discomfort offloading that to false advertising but since we have the FDA behind this it’s not troubling. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:34 pm
C’mon, admit it; you’re intrigued.) [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 11:00 am
”) Given the pressing diplomatic and policy challenges that Dobbins was subsequently tapped to grapple with in Bosnia, Kosovo and Afghanistan, he ends his memoir by observing that “[m]uch as I hate to admit it, and much as they would hate to hear it, Dan Burton and Jesse Helms probably did me a favor. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
The Example of Laws affecting Civil Society Karla W. [read post]
