Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 15,741
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2018, 7:12 am
– First rule of 3GWD: We don’t talk about 3GWD, Ryan!) [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 8:55 pm
At issue is the following Rule from the Rules Of Professional Conduct: RULE 4-8.2 JUDICIAL AND LEGAL OFFICIALS(a) Impugning Qualifications and Integrity of Judges or Other Officers. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 8:41 am
A piece of advice from one of our warriors George Nicoletti states that if you have a foreclosure sale date and your bank continues it, if you are able, go yourself or send someone to the auction, even if the bank has agreed to continue the foreclosure sale date. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:21 am
See, e.g., In re Benjamin, 33 Mass. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 11:49 am
Most clients don't think that a possible impact of their economizing efforts might be a reduction in the quality of legal services they're receiving. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 10:53 am
In re: Musical Instruments and Equipment Antitrust Litigation, No. 12-56674, 2015 U.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
Problem: how harmonized are these rules? [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 11:22 am
The analysis is long and detailed (and much worth reading, if you're interested in the topic); I think it's basically correct, for the reasons I discussed in 2017: 1. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:29 am
We suspect the investors who received [his] e-mails would not view the deception so favorably. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 10:59 am
The reaction of the legal profession killed the Evidence Code, as explained below. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 12:09 pm
Cir. 2002) (“‘A process is re- duced to practice when it is successfully performed. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
In April, the judge ruled in McMillan’s favor and ordered Yelp to reimburse him $2,700. [read post]
22 May 2009, 1:47 pm
Quinn represented the Washington Redskins in a long-running legal dispute with Native American activists over the team's name. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm
We continue to await an appellate ruling from the Ninth Circuit, having briefed the court on how recent legislation relates to our claims. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 10:17 pm
You should follow all these rules, and take it one step further: Buckle up in the backseat, even though it is not legally required if you are 16 or older. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 7:49 am
So two big favorites of modern legal scholarship - the Coase Theorem and the distinction between property and liabiltiy rules - have been deployed to describe the doctrines' effects.The Coase idea is that the entitlement to use state government services belongs to the states, not to the feds. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 2:44 pm
First, this blog post is in no way legal advice. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 3:12 am
Both appointees made clear their support for the 2015 Open Internet Order and belief that the FCC should begin a process to re-establish federal authority over broadband carriers, including network neutrality rules. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 7:32 am
Bray, Ames, Chafee, and Re on Remedies (2nd ed., forthcoming 2017). [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 11:21 pm
We see the "symmetry" in the court's rules requiring proof to a "legal certainty" in both situations, but we don't see the logic. [read post]
