Search for: "People v Word" Results 3881 - 3900 of 17,911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
 SPOILER ALERT: no.Carr J held that TITANIC SPA is a composite mark (in other words, the word "spa" was an important part of the mark). [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
” If we limit the Article V “We the People” to loyal states, we need neither nationalize it, like Ackerman, nor make it intergenerational, like Colby, nor allow it to be subject to coercion, like Harrison and Amar. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 12:30 am by Mark
Charlie had said that some people in his business had indicated that names could not be trademarked. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
Tuesday afternoon I had the pleasure of debating/discussing King v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 9:43 am by Jon Ibanez
This was exactly the issue in the 2012 California Court of Appeals case of People v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:50 am by Daniel Schwartz
  When I first thought of this, we just wanted to spread the word about the program. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 3:23 am by SHG
The trick here is to reframe the question from accused v. accuser to weak woman v. powerful man. [read post]