Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 3881 - 3900 of 21,967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2011, 8:59 am
The plaintiff, Ryan Jones, claims that Patrol Trooper, Lisa Steed, pulled him over while he was driving March 28, 2009. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 10:50 pm by News Desk
Plaintiffs Sarah Schacht and Alison Cardinal ate at Ambassel on February 8 and 15, respectively. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 9:04 am by Richard Arnholt
The plaintiffs have asked for three business days to respond, and it is unclear when the ED of KY will act on DOJ’s request. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
But, because Catholic teachings have implications for some social issues that some consider offensive, those messages were shared, student outrage was fomented, and the Student Senate implemented an ad hoc religious test for office: no one with Mr. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:56 pm by David Lat
[Volokh Conspiracy / Washington Post] * Now that Harvard Law School will accept GRE scores in lieu of LSAT scores, what do law school applicants need to know about the two tests? [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:29 am by Howard Friedman
In the case the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded a district court's Establishment Clause decision that had relied on the now-repudiated Lemon test. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 7:53 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
”  The trial included two days of testimony from patient and physician plaintiffs, and expert witnesses. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 4:52 pm by Howard Friedman
They also claim that this violates the religious test prohibition in Art. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The District Court dismissed the complaint because the dagger or asterisk symbol next to the “Peak HP” label directs the consumer to fine print explaining that “Peak HP” is the horsepower achieved in laboratory testing, not ordinary use. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Nor were there any Pennsylvania-centered activities by the Defendant against which to apply the “arise from”/”relate to” test. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 7:39 am by Docket Navigator
The court granted defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's willful infringement claim because it was based on post-filing conduct. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
*A United States District Court judge granted the City’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Matthews had spoken as a public employee and not as a citizen and thus his speech was not protected by the First Amendment.Citing Cox v Warwick Valley Central School District, 654 F3d 267, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals said that the test it applied in cases in which a plaintiff asserts a First Amendment retaliation claim requires the plaintiff to establish that: (1)… [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 8:00 am
However, Stryker apparently did not conduct any safety testing on the devices before they were sold to the general public. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:40 pm by Andrew Crocker
As we wrote then, the court applied a test that failed to give full weight to the First Amendment. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 10:47 pm
The plaintiffs in these cases claim that Bayer either knew should have known how dangerous their pills were before putting them on the market. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 12:44 pm
A history was taken, he was examined and diagnostic tests were performed. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
This distinction is difficult to grasp, hence this series of mini-exercises.Problem 23The statement:To prove that Defendant was fond of Plaintiff, Wanda Witness testified that Defendant said to Plaintiff, “I hope you’ll agree to go out with me. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 4:53 pm by Howard Friedman
 [W]e conclude that the plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their claim with respect to the stained glass grant. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:30 am by Howard Friedman
The second threshold test is also satisfied; the facts show that Defendants’ actions were not “aimed at impeding religion,” but were instead aimed at maintaining the peace while the parties settled a bitterly contested property dispute.The court also dismissed due process, 4th Amendment and false imprisonment claims. [read post]