Search for: "The People v. Cross" Results 3881 - 3900 of 5,469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2023, 9:39 am by Matthew Guariglia
In South Africa, the High Court found that “no lawful authority has been demonstrated to trespass onto the privacy rights or the freedom of expression rights of anyone, including South Africans whose communications cross-cross the world by means of bulk [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am by Karina Lytvynska
By Atreya Mathur “By far, the greatest danger of Artificial Intelligence is that people conclude too early that they understand it. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
Steve Peoples reports for the Associated Press that “instead of celebrating publicly, some evangelical leaders are downplaying their fortune on an issue that has defined their movement for decades. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 1:40 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Respect the rights of people involved in the news. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:02 am by Richard Hunt
Again, Defendants will have ample opportunity to cross-examine Ms. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 1:06 pm by Amy Howe
Strangio pointed to earlier bans on service by transgender people in the military, as well as bans on cross-dressing. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:12 pm by cdw
”    [via FindLaw] People v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Indeed, unless a given jurisdiction has the requisite market power, it is likely to make itself worse-off on balance, not just the people in other jurisdictions, by reason of imposing them. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:31 pm by Joe Mullin
" According to a transcript, Rader, who was in the audience, interjected: "How many people have died of water pollution over the course of human events? [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 4:49 am by Stephen Page
It is my respectful submission that my conduct falls well short of the conduct required to meet the test in Grimwade v Meagher, that is conduct which might make it appropriate for me to be removed as counsel in this matter. [read post]
22 May 2023, 6:47 am by Russell Knight
“[T]he general rule is that testimony of a witness’ opinion is not admissible into evidence” People v. [read post]