Search for: "US v. Davis"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 4,721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
The following year, the Court held, in Davis v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 9:29 am
Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 690 (2001); Addington v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:48 am
The actual wording used must be carefully analyzed. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 8:03 am
Davis, 510 U.S. 1315, 1317 (1994) (Blackmun, J., in chambers). [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
(Mrs Laura McQueen v Daily Record, Clause 5, 24/05/2012). [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am
The following is a chronological listing of some pertinent cases that rejected or limited the use of overtly probabilistic evidence. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
Alan Rusbridger, editor of the Guardian, used the Orwell lecture 2011 to describe the development of the phone hacking scandal and outline his vision for a new press regulation system. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am
That brings us to the real stars, this week’s new relists. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
But last week the Ninth Circuit decided a case that shows how tricky government consideration of race can be, and how lower court judges sometimes make missteps in this complex area.The case is Mitchell v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
Nance v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 10:37 am
The Alice decision, and its companion, Octane Fitness v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 5:46 am
http://t.co/w81MKDW (Molly McDonough) Study Reveals How Professionals Use LinkedIn – http://t.co/SDPOlCP (Susan Gunelius) Subjective Requirements? [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 1:33 pm
Davis, 139 S. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am
Indiana law provides a (rarely used) mechanism for criminal defendants to raise such claims on direct appeal. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 5:45 am
Davis, 26 F.3d 1314, 1325 (5th Cir. 1994)(citation omitted). [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
On rebuttal, the State sought to introduce portions of Leffew's statement to police that it was Hernandez that strangled Fernandez under Rule 806, which allows the impeachment of hearsay with other hearsay.The majority held that though this statement was clearly testimonial under Crawford and Davis v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:20 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:20 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Parke-Davis, 733 P.2d 507, 515-16 (Wash. 1987); Bond v. [read post]
