Search for: "US v. Smith"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 8,541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2011, 4:16 am
Plaintiff's claim that had he not resigned, he may have been able to hide his fraudulent activities, [*4]continue to collect fees, and reach an agreement with OCM is purely speculative and does not raise a triable issue of fact (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434-436 [2007]; GUS Consulting Gmb, 74 AD3d at 679; Phillips-Smith Speciality Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759… [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 2:05 pm
Smith, 528 So. 2d 962 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 9:58 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 10:23 pm
On February 13, 2014, Green Hills Mixed Use, LLC submitted an application to the Metropolitan Nashville Planning Department for approval of a proposed 2.67 acre mixed-use development in Nashville. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 8:26 am
State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
On Monday, in Ramos v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 9:30 pm
“This session explores the 1902 landmark decision Roberson v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:23 am
They both told us how useful they found the new – adopted in 2015 − Pennsylvania Suggested Standard (Civil) Jury Instructions (“Pa. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
Smith v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 2:14 am
IPWatchdog answers this with reference to the case of Persion Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
Smith v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
Practice Tip #2: The standard for an actual controversy under the Declaratory Judgment Act was most recently addressed by the Supreme Court in MedImmune, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
L.J. 215, n. 116 (2012) (citing Lindsey Anderson Smith, Note, Crowdfunding and Using Net Worth to Determine Investment Limits, 90 Denv. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 2:32 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 9:25 am
Cir. 2014) (holding that “[t]he Board erred by failing to construe ‘threshold value’ as it is used in claims 1–6 before finding that [prior art reference] Smith failed to disclose a ‘threshold value’” in anticipation). [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 5:43 am
That brings us to City of Boerne v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 2:09 pm
Miller; and Whether cell-phone call records are distinct from the home-phone call records at issue in Smith v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:43 am
Ingerman Smith LLP (E.D. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
In Smith v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
Co. v. [read post]
