Search for: "United States v. Cooper" Results 3881 - 3900 of 4,613
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2009, 9:17 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Rather that conceptualizing fairness in relation to States (developed v. developing), should we ask what international law can do to protect – or more importantly perhaps – to empower vulnerable communities? [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 517 F.3d 1319, 1339 n.22 & 1344 (Fed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:28 am by Susan Brenner
The United States initiated this prosecution by filing a criminal complaint on December 21, 2006. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 11:06 am by Jeralyn
THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION GUARANTEES THE ACCUSED THE RIGHT TO COMPULSORY PROCESS FOR WITNESSES IN ITS DEFENSE. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 3:54 am
Bush to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:57 am by Tom Lamb
From Pretrial Order #48: In the spirit of cooperation and collegiality evident since the inception of this MDL, several distinguished state judicial officers presiding over certain consolidated Digitek actions have graciously agreed to conduct, with the undersigned, a joint hearing to address the scientific and technical issues presented in this litigation for resolution pursuant to Daubert v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 12:05 am by Editor
4thCircuit-Seal.png In drug conspiracy prosecution, law enforcement expert testimony concerning the use of code words in recorded conversations (which was based on experience and testimonial statements from interviews with informants, cooperators and witnesses) did not violate the Confrontation Clause since the experts “presented their independent assessments to the jury” and “did not become mere conduits for that hearsay,” in United… [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 1:36 pm
The Respondents divided their argument, with Solicitor General Elena Kagan arguing for the United States (as intervenor) and Jeffrey Lamken from MoloLamken LLP for the PCAOB. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(IP Dragon) Trademark registration in China (China Law Blog) Another ridiculous IPR protection awareness event (China Hearsay)   Colombia Colombia’s Senate approves accession to Madrid Protocol in second reading (Managing IP)   Europe EU member states sign agreement in principle on establishing single EU patent (Managing IP) (IAM) (Blog@IPJUR.com) (IPKat) Lisbon treaty updates EU; new commissioners named (IP Watch) Hague Agreement: you win some, you lose some –… [read post]