Search for: "United States v. State of Washington"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 9,057
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
” As simply stated in Seran v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
United States, 459 U.S. 131 (1982), the Supreme Court held that when an agency issues sequential decisions, reversal by a court of a later decision does not automatically reinstate an earlier one. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, 134 S.Ct. 568 (2013). [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:23 pm
Consider the recent example of South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 7:57 pm
Army has been closely watching civilian political activity within the United States. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:31 am
In the Microsoft case it was key that the FRAND contract case had been brought in the United States approximately eight months before Motorola filed the related German lawsuits, and Motorola had offered, in a letter sent from Illinois to Washington State in 2010, a worldwide license covering its declared-essential H.264 and IEEE 802.11 patents, also listing the European counterparts of the relevant U.S. patents. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 6:00 am
For example, in the United States, the U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:53 am
” In an op-ed for the Christian Science Monitor Arjun Sethi discusses United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 11:29 am
The European Commission has announced an agreement today with the United States Department of Commerce (DOC) to replace the invalidated Safe Harbor agreement on transatlantic data flows with a new EU-U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:33 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:42 am
Spangler and The Spangler Group, Inc.Case Number: 12-cv-00856 (United States District Court for the Western District of Washington)Case Filed: May 17, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 13, 2014 3/31/15 6/29/15 2015-31 SEC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:00 pm
United States 15-537Issue: (1) Whether, under Ashe v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:42 pm
Kappos Regarding the Overlapping Delay Provision of 35 U.S.C.154(b)(2)(A) WASHINGTON – The Commerce Department’s United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is providing patentees with the ability to request a recalculation of their patent term adjustment without a fee or petition as is normally required pending completion of necessary modifications to the USPTO’s computer program for calculating patent term adjustments. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:10 am
” At The World and Everything in It, Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
United States, a fraud prosecution stemming from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey, arguing that “[i]f the Court chooses to apply the logic of Department of Commerce v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 6:22 am
” Also, at PrawfsBlawg, Bill Araiza compares three recent Supreme Court cases—Citizens United, United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
United States. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm
REUVENI: The United States thinks Your Honor can be fair and impartial. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:33 am
Among others, the Washington Post has coverage. [read post]
