Search for: "Wells v. Heard*"
Results 3881 - 3900
of 9,178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2010, 10:30 pm
TTM v London Borough of Hackney & Ors [2010] EWHC 1349 (Admin) (11 June 2010) – Read judgment A man accused of harassing women he did not know has failed in his human rights challenge to his detention under the Mental Health Act 1983. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
As in Hammon v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm
Among Judge Murphy’s well known majority opinions are: Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:25 pm
In Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:07 am
I really do hope that the Court doesn’t edge back towards Ohio v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in the 1852 case of Moore v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:49 pm
Professor Salem also gave evidence that the combining of different anti-platelet drugs without strict medical supervision was dangerous because it invited a major bleeding, and said: “People are well known to die from this [a combination of anti-platelet drugs]. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:18 pm
Well, perhaps someone did think of it. [read post]
13 Oct 2018, 8:22 am
In New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:57 am
” At Reuters, Ted Hesson provides an explainer for Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 4:10 am
Importantly, the Kim court also noted that the "definitely and specifically" standard federal courts have applied in determining whether a complainant engaged in protected activity is alive and well (at least within the Ninth Circuit), despite the finding in Sylvester v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 12:21 pm
But the dramatic reveal of Judge Alsup’s technology chops came well into the trial, in an off-hand comment. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:32 am
Backstory: Campbell v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
In Clean Train Coalition Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:11 am
As a sophisticated actor holding a prominent position in the university hierarchy, Faghri was well-equipped and well-positioned to make use of that opportunity. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
The case is Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 3:15 am
The blog’s reference to the SEC’s position in “Barnes” refers to Barnes v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 3:30 am
Well, no. [read post]
