Search for: "Williams v. Justice Court" Results 3881 - 3900 of 5,968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am by Jay Willis
  Meanwhile, Ben Conery of the Washington Times, Pete Williams of MSNBC, and the AP all cover Monday’s denial of cert. in Rodearmel v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:29 pm by Neil Cahn
Albany County Supreme Court Justice Gerald William Connolly denied both motions. [read post]
17 May 2018, 4:38 pm by Jeff Gamso
Kristoff's op-ed grew out of a dissenting opinion by 9th Circuit Judge William Fletcher in Cooper v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
The recent amendments to the Divorce Act, RSC 1985, c 3 (2nd Supp) and the Supreme Court of Canada decision, Colucci v Colucci, 2021 SCC 24 suggest that lawyers are required to screen for family violence to be able to competently comply with their statutory obligations. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:44 am by INFORRM
If the jury is to be retained, then the Bar Council (pdf), the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice and Equality (pdf), McCann Fitzgerald (pdf), the National Union of Journalists (pdf), RTE (pdf), and William Fry (pdf), all recommended that, having regard to the decision of the Court of Appeal in Higgins v Irish Aviation Authority [2016] IECA 322 (04 November 2016), the jury should not be included in the offer of… [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:47 am by Dawn Johnsen
Justices David Souter and Clarence Thomas had succeeded Justices William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall, leaving only two of Webster’s four dissenting Justices supportive of Roe. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:03 am
Second, the book contains the first detailed, behind-the-scenes reconstruction of what happened at the Court during Bush v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 4:05 am by Alfred Brophy
When the Virginia Law Review  discussed the Virgina Supreme Court's 1925 decision in Buck v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:35 pm
The now-defunct Exchequer Court examined the issue back in 1964, in Canada (Minister of National Revenue – M.N.R.) v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Justice Thomas only this past week, for example, indicated that the Court should not be hesitant to overrule its own precedents should they be manifestly unjust.I realize that I basically agree with the McCloskeyan approach and, therefore, am inclined to agree with much of Lessig’s argument insofar as it is similar. [read post]