Search for: "Goldstein "
Results 3901 - 3920
of 5,881
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am
Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to the blog in various capacities, served as co-counsel to the petitioners in Greene and Florence, but the author of this post was not involved in those cases.] [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:31 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represents the petitioners in Freeman.] [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 1:33 pm
Thomas Goldstein of Washington, D.C.'s Goldstein & Russell, urged the justices to hold that the Fourth Amendment requires reasonable suspicion for strip searches of all arrestees in order to protect individual integrity and dignity. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am
According to Goldstein, reasonable suspicion should always exist when the arrest is for a major offense. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:40 pm
Goldstein, who has testified in toxic tort cases, mostly (but not exclusively) for plaintiffs. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
And they’re off! [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:24 am
According to Goldstein, reasonable suspicion should always exist when the arrest is for a major offense. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
(Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as co-counsel to Florence.) [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:06 am
According to Goldstein, reasonable suspicion should always exist when the arrest is for a major offense. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 9:10 am
Goldstein was proposing as a Fourth Amendment standard to govern strip-searching. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am
Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:13 pm
(Orin Kerr) An interesting segment, and one that features commentary from the likes of blogfather Eugene, Ed Whelan, Tom Goldstein, and Charles Fried. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:00 am
The following argument recap of Golan v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:19 am
(Granted )Note: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the petitioners in this case.Docket: 10-1042Issue(s): Whether Section 8(b) of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act prohibits a real estate settlement services provider from charging an unearned fee only if the fee is divided between two or more parties.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (5th Cir.)Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners' replyCVSG Information:Invited: May 16, 2011Filed: August… [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:08 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys either work for or contribute to this blog, represents the petitioners in the case, but the author of this post operates independently of the law firm.] [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:34 am
(Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:23 am
Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the petitioner this case. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 3:02 am
[DISCLOSURE: Goldstein & Russell filed an amicus brief in the case in support of respondent Cheryl Perich. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:55 am
"Those are serious matters," said Gerry Goldstein, one of the state's leading criminal defense lawyers whose San Antonio firm joined Morton's cause earlier this year. [read post]
