Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 5,817
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2012, 10:45 am
DOREEN DISALVATORE IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS J. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:26 am
The chances increased late last year after State Senator Larcenia J. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm
Today, Judge J. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
(b) Eady J, Richard Ferguson QC, Leveson LJ? [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:59 pm
Ct. at 2 (statement of Kennedy, J., with whom Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Beyer, JJ., join, respecting denial of rehearing). [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 2:31 pm
(This is one of several decisions in this matter.) [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
As a result, only the provisions of the EPC 1973 are applied.Computation of the beginning and the end of the TFO[4] In agreement with the parties the Board of appeal bases its considerations on the following factual situation: The wording of claim 1 according to the decision to grant a patent of October 26, 2006, comprised three parallel alternatives A, B, and C, whereas the wording of claim 1 of the patent specification in the relevant German version only contained the alternatives A and… [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 11:45 am
Bennett & Lawrence B. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 11:42 am
(j) (1) The board of directors shall not take action on any item of business outside of a meeting [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 10:19 am
At issue was whether the District Judge was wrong to reject a) a proportionality defence and b) a gateway B public law defence arising from Lewisham’s failure to follow its own policy. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
See also Hamdi, 542 U.S. at 549-551 (Souter, J., joined by Ginsburg, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment) (government could not rely upon the AUMF to supersede an earlier statute limiting detention where the government was not acting in accord with the laws of war). [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
See also Hamdi, 542 U.S. at 549-551 (Souter, J., joined by Ginsburg, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment) (government could not rely upon the AUMF to supersede an earlier statute limiting detention where the government was not acting in accord with the laws of war). [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
LESLEY J. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 5:16 am
At issue was whether the District Judge was wrong to reject a) a proportionality defence and b) a gateway B public law defence arising from Lewisham’s failure to follow its own policy. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 5:16 am
At issue was whether the District Judge was wrong to reject a) a proportionality defence and b) a gateway B public law defence arising from Lewisham’s failure to follow its own policy. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:01 am
(a) Exclusion Amount- (1) IN GENERAL- Subparagraph (A) of section 2010(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘$5,000,000’ and inserting ‘$1,000,000’. (2) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT- Subparagraph (B) of section 2010(c)(3) of such Code is amended– (A) by striking ‘2011’ in the matter preceding clause (i) and inserting ‘2012’, and (B) by striking ‘2010’ in clause (ii) and inserting… [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:17 am
Krull, 480 U.S. at 368 (O’Connor, J., dissenting) (observing that, “under [the Court’s] decision today, no effective remedy is to be provided in the very case in which the statute at issue was held unconstitutional”). [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against the order of Tugendhat J ([2010] EWHC 2818 (QB)) in JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:41 pm
§ 843(b). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 7:32 am
§ 1395y(b)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
