Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 5,350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2011, 11:26 am
Spiers, 79 P.3d 30 (Wash. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:00 am
Respectfully submitted, GEORGE P. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:00 am
As for private funds, Rule 205-3(b) requires a look -through from the fund to the investors in the fund. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Respectfully submitted, GEORGE P. [read post]
10 May 2011, 7:30 am
Warranty of Habitability ( New York Real Property Law § 235-b) Every written or oral residential lease warrants that the premises and common areas will be maintained in a condition that is: (a) fit for human habitation; (b) fit for uses reasonably intended by the parties; and (c) free from conditions endangering or detrimental to life, health, or safety of the occupants. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:17 am
Fakhr Jahan Begam & Ors. 1922 (49) IA 195 referred to `Mohammadan Law'; by Syed Ameer Ali and approved the statement made therein that three conditions are necessary for a valid gift by a Muslim: (a) manifestation of the wish to give on the part of the donor; (b) the acceptance of the donee, either impliedly or expressly; (c) the taking of possession of the subject-matter of the gift by the donee, either actually or constructively. [read post]
9 May 2011, 10:48 am
Atkins, 145 P.3d 1161, 1165 (Ut. [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:00 am
Respectfully submitted, GEORGE P. [read post]
9 May 2011, 5:03 am
False advertising claims under the UCL and CLRA sound in fraud and thus must meet Rule 9(b)’s heightened standard. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:30 am
P. 12(b)(1), Amway moved to dismiss the Guzzardo Plaintiffs’ complaint, asserting a lack of subject matter jurisdiction because of the absence in the pleading, as originally filed, of an express assertion of an amount in controversy in excess of $5 million, as required under CAFA. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:01 pm
The concurrence in this matter takes a broad swipe at the idea of vigorous advocacy in postconviction proceedings. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:10 pm
., as well as each and every discovery request, discovery event, court proceeding, and other substantive matter. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:01 pm
P. 52(a). [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:30 pm
P. 23(b)(1), 23(b)(2), and 23(b)(3)--constitute an important factor in analyzing whether or not punitive damages are appropriate. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm
[xix] And no matter h [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:30 pm
It was suggested that in order to establish liability a claim would have to show: (a) A reasonable expectation of privacy; and (b) The act or conduct complained of is highly offensive to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities (See Australian Law Reform Commission, “For Your Information: Australian Privacy Law and Practice”, Report 108, May 2008, Recommendations 74-1 and 74-2, p.2584). [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:45 pm
§ 514.235(b) permit a direct appeal to an appellate court within 60 days after the entry of a relevant FDA order.) [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:35 pm
Law Code § 8-205(b)(2) and (3). [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am
It was suggested that in order to establish liability a claim would have to show: (a) A reasonable expectation of privacy; and (b) The act or conduct complained of is highly offensive to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities (See Australian Law Reform Commission, “For Your Information: Australian Privacy Law and Practice”, Report 108, May 2008, Recommendations 74-1 and 74-2, p.2584). [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
P’ship, 860 F.2d 415, 418 (Fed. [read post]
