Search for: "STATE v. SAMPLE" Results 3901 - 3920 of 4,544
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2017, 8:04 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Other examples of remedial efforts taken too far include Justice Zucker’s decision last year in R. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
It states that a performance “in the case of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, [is] to show [the work's] images in any sequence or to make the sounds accompanying it audible. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm by Kit Walsh
Mexico has just adopted a terrible new copyright law, thanks to pressure from the United States (and specifically from the copyright maximalists that hold outsized influence on US foreign policy). [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 12:51 pm by Lawrence Taylor
Urine tests are only used if you cannot provide either a breath or blood sample, or if the tests cannot be performed. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 11:24 am by Ben
The research shows that developing countries in the sample are now at the level of openness that existed in the wealthy countries 30 years ago. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
I was also counsel—though not lead counsel—in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:33 pm by Lyle Denniston
On Tuesday, this clash of perceptions returns to the Court, with review of the latest class-action dispute, Tyson Foods v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 1:46 pm by Thomas Swartz
  The First Department was faced with this interesting question yesterday in Speranza v Repro Lab Inc., 2009 NY Slip Op 01543.In 1997, Mark Speranza deposited a number of semen specimens at Repro Lab, Inc., a tissue bank licensed by the State. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:22 pm
Did a person have to provide physical samples like blood, hair, hand-writing? [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:46 pm by Schachtman
Griffis states that p-values are expressed as percentages “usually 95% or 99%, corresponding to 0.05 or 0.01,” but this states things backwards. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:29 pm by Ken
Hr’g Tr., Sunlust Pictures, LLC v. [read post]